From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: ira.weiny@intel.com, 'Dan Williams' <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: PKS for the page cache and beyond
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:05:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220212010556.GU785175@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
Protection Key Supervisor (PKS) presents a way to control access to a large
domain of memory quickly, without a page table walk or TLB flush, as well as
with finer granularity; allowing protection control on individual threads.
Multiple areas of memory have been identified as candidates to be protected
with PKS. These include the initial use case persistent memory (PMEM), page
tables[1], kernel secret keys[2], and the page cache.[3] Like PMEM the page
cache presents a significant surface area where stray writes, or other bugs,
could corrupt data permanently.
I would like to discuss the ramifications of being able to change memory
permissions in this new way. While PKS has a lot to offer it does not come for
free. One trade off is the loss of direct access via page_address() in
!HIGHMEM builds.
Already PMEM's faced challenges in the leverage of kmap/kunmap. While the page
cache should be able to leverage this work, this is driving a redefinition of
what kmap means. Especially since the HIGHMEM use case is increasingly
meaningless on modern machines.
Ira Weiny
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210830235927.6443-2-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201009201410.3209180-3-ira.weiny@intel.com/
[3] https://lwn.net/Articles/883352/
reply other threads:[~2022-02-12 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220212010556.GU785175@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox