From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/gup: remove get_user_pages_locked()
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220131120557.rwde6sphc245pzu7@quack3.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220131051752.447699-5-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Sun 30-01-22 21:17:52, John Hubbard wrote:
> Unraveling the rat's nest set of APIs in mm/gup.c a bit more.
> get_user_pages_locked() was not helping at all, so remove it.
>
> Also, lookup_node() has only a single caller, but it is still worth
> having a clearer locking policy there. Changing it so that the caller
> both takes and releases the mmap_lock, thus leaving lookup_node() with
> the sole job of translating a virtual address into a numa node ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Well, the point of _locked() GUP variants is that we can unlock mmap_sem
when reading a page from the disk during a page fault (hidden behind
VM_FAULT_RETRY). So as such _locked() variants are about reducing mmap_sem
latency rather than code readability. In this particular case, I don't
think using _locked() variant in lookup_node() is very beneficial
(generally I would not expect to take a fault there) but at least a
justification in the commit message should be different :).
Honza
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 --
> mm/gup.c | 59 ----------------------------------------------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 22 ++++++++---------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 80c540c17d83..528ef1cb4f3a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1916,8 +1916,6 @@ long get_user_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> long pin_user_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
> struct vm_area_struct **vmas);
> -long get_user_pages_locked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> - unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, int *locked);
> long get_user_pages_unlocked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> struct page **pages, unsigned int gup_flags);
> long pin_user_pages_unlocked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 58d01a96ab30..4a43c79f0972 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2119,65 +2119,6 @@ long get_user_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages);
>
> -/**
> - * get_user_pages_locked() - variant of get_user_pages()
> - *
> - * @start: starting user address
> - * @nr_pages: number of pages from start to pin
> - * @gup_flags: flags modifying lookup behaviour
> - * @pages: array that receives pointers to the pages pinned.
> - * Should be at least nr_pages long. Or NULL, if caller
> - * only intends to ensure the pages are faulted in.
> - * @locked: pointer to lock flag indicating whether lock is held and
> - * subsequently whether VM_FAULT_RETRY functionality can be
> - * utilised. Lock must initially be held.
> - *
> - * It is suitable to replace the form:
> - *
> - * mmap_read_lock(mm);
> - * do_something()
> - * get_user_pages(mm, ..., pages, NULL);
> - * mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> - *
> - * to:
> - *
> - * int locked = 1;
> - * mmap_read_lock(mm);
> - * do_something()
> - * get_user_pages_locked(mm, ..., pages, &locked);
> - * if (locked)
> - * mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> - *
> - * We can leverage the VM_FAULT_RETRY functionality in the page fault
> - * paths better by using either get_user_pages_locked() or
> - * get_user_pages_unlocked().
> - *
> - */
> -long get_user_pages_locked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> - unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages,
> - int *locked)
> -{
> - /*
> - * FIXME: Current FOLL_LONGTERM behavior is incompatible with
> - * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because of the FS DAX check requirement on
> - * vmas. As there are no users of this flag in this call we simply
> - * disallow this option for now.
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM))
> - return -EINVAL;
> - /*
> - * FOLL_PIN must only be set internally by the pin_user_pages*() APIs,
> - * never directly by the caller, so enforce that:
> - */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_PIN))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return __get_user_pages_locked(current->mm, start, nr_pages,
> - pages, NULL, locked,
> - gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_locked);
> -
> /*
> * get_user_pages_unlocked() is suitable to replace the form:
> *
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 028e8dd82b44..040d88354cfa 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -907,17 +907,15 @@ static void get_policy_nodemask(struct mempolicy *p, nodemask_t *nodes)
> static int lookup_node(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> {
> struct page *p = NULL;
> - int err;
> + int ret;
>
> - int locked = 1;
> - err = get_user_pages_locked(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p, &locked);
> - if (err > 0) {
> - err = page_to_nid(p);
> + mmap_assert_locked(mm);
> + ret = get_user_pages(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p, NULL);
> + if (ret > 0) {
> + ret = page_to_nid(p);
> put_page(p);
> }
> - if (locked)
> - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> - return err;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* Retrieve NUMA policy */
> @@ -968,15 +966,15 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask,
> if (flags & MPOL_F_NODE) {
> if (flags & MPOL_F_ADDR) {
> /*
> - * Take a refcount on the mpol, lookup_node()
> - * will drop the mmap_lock, so after calling
> - * lookup_node() only "pol" remains valid, "vma"
> - * is stale.
> + * Take a refcount on the mpol, because we are about to
> + * drop the mmap_lock, after which only "pol" remains
> + * valid, "vma" is stale.
> */
> pol_refcount = pol;
> vma = NULL;
> mpol_get(pol);
> err = lookup_node(mm, addr);
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> if (err < 0)
> goto out;
> *policy = err;
> --
> 2.35.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 5:17 [PATCH 0/4] mm/gup: some cleanups John Hubbard
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Fix invalid page pointer returned with FOLL_PIN gups John Hubbard
2022-02-02 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/gup: clean up follow_pfn_pte() slightly John Hubbard
2022-01-31 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/gup: remove unused pin_user_pages_locked() John Hubbard
2022-01-31 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-31 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-02-02 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-31 5:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/gup: remove get_user_pages_locked() John Hubbard
2022-01-31 12:05 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2022-01-31 20:01 ` John Hubbard
2022-01-31 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-31 20:01 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220131120557.rwde6sphc245pzu7@quack3.lan \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox