From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, djwong@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org,
jane.chu@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 03:39:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201280314.SI8wtlfT-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127124058.1172422-9-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Hi Shiyang,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.17-rc1 next-20220127]
[cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220127-204239
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2c271fe77d52a0555161926c232cd5bc07178b39
config: ia64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220128/202201280314.SI8wtlfT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/cb7650562991fc273fbf4c53b6e3db4bb9bb0b5e
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220127-204239
git checkout cb7650562991fc273fbf4c53b6e3db4bb9bb0b5e
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h:14,
from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:80,
from fs/xfs/xfs.h:22,
from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:6:
include/linux/dax.h:73:30: warning: 'struct dax_holder_operations' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
73 | const struct dax_holder_operations *ops)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c: In function 'xfs_alloc_buftarg':
>> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:1959:33: error: passing argument 3 of 'dax_register_holder' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
1959 | &xfs_dax_holder_operations);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| const struct dax_holder_operations *
In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h:14,
from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:80,
from fs/xfs/xfs.h:22,
from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c:6:
include/linux/dax.h:73:53: note: expected 'const struct dax_holder_operations *' but argument is of type 'const struct dax_holder_operations *'
73 | const struct dax_holder_operations *ops)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h:14,
from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:80,
from fs/xfs/xfs.h:22,
from fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:6:
include/linux/dax.h:73:30: warning: 'struct dax_holder_operations' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
73 | const struct dax_holder_operations *ops)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:220:14: error: variable 'xfs_dax_holder_operations' has initializer but incomplete type
220 | const struct dax_holder_operations xfs_dax_holder_operations = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:10: error: 'const struct dax_holder_operations' has no member named 'notify_failure'
221 | .notify_failure = xfs_dax_notify_failure,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:35: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
221 | .notify_failure = xfs_dax_notify_failure,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:35: note: (near initialization for 'xfs_dax_holder_operations')
>> fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:220:36: error: storage size of 'xfs_dax_holder_operations' isn't known
220 | const struct dax_holder_operations xfs_dax_holder_operations = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/dax_register_holder +1959 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
1938
1939 struct xfs_buftarg *
1940 xfs_alloc_buftarg(
1941 struct xfs_mount *mp,
1942 struct block_device *bdev)
1943 {
1944 xfs_buftarg_t *btp;
1945
1946 btp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*btp), KM_NOFS);
1947
1948 btp->bt_mount = mp;
1949 btp->bt_dev = bdev->bd_dev;
1950 btp->bt_bdev = bdev;
1951 btp->bt_daxdev = fs_dax_get_by_bdev(bdev, &btp->bt_dax_part_off);
1952 if (btp->bt_daxdev) {
1953 if (dax_get_holder(btp->bt_daxdev)) {
1954 xfs_err(mp, "DAX device already in use?!");
1955 goto error_free;
1956 }
1957
1958 dax_register_holder(btp->bt_daxdev, mp,
> 1959 &xfs_dax_holder_operations);
1960 }
1961
1962 /*
1963 * Buffer IO error rate limiting. Limit it to no more than 10 messages
1964 * per 30 seconds so as to not spam logs too much on repeated errors.
1965 */
1966 ratelimit_state_init(&btp->bt_ioerror_rl, 30 * HZ,
1967 DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
1968
1969 if (xfs_setsize_buftarg_early(btp, bdev))
1970 goto error_free;
1971
1972 if (list_lru_init(&btp->bt_lru))
1973 goto error_free;
1974
1975 if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
1976 goto error_lru;
1977
1978 btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
1979 btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
1980 btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
1981 btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
1982 if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker))
1983 goto error_pcpu;
1984 return btp;
1985
1986 error_pcpu:
1987 percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
1988 error_lru:
1989 list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
1990 error_free:
1991 kmem_free(btp);
1992 return NULL;
1993 }
1994
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 12:40 [PATCH v10 0/9] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Shiyang Ruan
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] dax: Introduce holder for dax_device Shiyang Ruan
2022-01-27 16:13 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27 16:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-02 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-13 12:58 ` [PATCH v10.1 " Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-15 22:06 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] mm: factor helpers for memory_failure_dev_pagemap Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-01 21:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-15 22:11 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] pagemap,pmem: Introduce ->memory_failure() Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-15 22:38 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] fsdax: fix function description Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-02 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 23:51 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] fsdax: Introduce dax_load_page() Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 1:34 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-16 3:02 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 3:07 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] mm: move pgoff_address() to vma_pgoff_address() Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 1:37 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 1:47 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-16 1:49 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Shiyang Ruan
2022-01-27 17:56 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-27 19:39 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-02-01 20:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-13 13:02 ` [PATCH v10.1 " Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-15 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-02-15 9:42 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 1:56 ` [PATCH v10 " Dan Williams
2022-01-27 12:40 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] fsdax: set a CoW flag when associate reflink mappings Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 2:09 ` Dan Williams
2022-02-16 2:55 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-02-16 3:09 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202201280314.SI8wtlfT-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox