From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A887C433EF for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B49BF6B0072; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AFA1E6B0073; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9E8226B0074; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0142.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5D16B0072 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:57:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D1B181EFF67 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79076823504.14.CD977EF Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441E8140010 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:57:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1643306231; x=1674842231; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MbebQvVeK/L5gHgjdvp87DSPXN0J04vX9FIoAyBipG8=; b=Vw3o3PSyB+iVK+t389sR9X9j2nV1bE4Qyxm0A8eU0QVpmHWKZYFbd6+B gKJXZ7epC8Nwpa1y9/0KHVYW9YS6VNUiCsNjSJkTsGzzNcbCAR57odfs8 +GNoO4J0ZVPWLUI1lM+GTvid9Dv3cT0vLqyq0JdKmDC8AC0iKtGO3wD2o JrQCVD/EyaTPBOfXbm8x3eKXTLwEYtSMz9nAErcSHHUisgWSlUMzfKmXj YHKhRF11LJzGd0acmlI+68q16OBcjJTwdys1I/QxSrlCJQtAOx6O70luP UpuIaGOKS3fXGwL8dy/scMqx/eDMvZ9+TM1gdcr5l3zyVbyGrnmGVNGsL Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10239"; a="230500522" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,321,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="230500522" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jan 2022 09:57:09 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,321,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="480393272" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2022 09:57:06 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nD918-000MtF-2I; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 17:57:06 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:56:56 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Shiyang Ruan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, djwong@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, jane.chu@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] xfs: Implement ->notify_failure() for XFS Message-ID: <202201280101.4ECasWmD-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220127124058.1172422-9-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220127124058.1172422-9-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Stat-Signature: inkhchuesm9mtq19enjqyriy4fzeyqet X-Rspam-User: nil Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Vw3o3PSy; spf=none (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of lkp@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.126) smtp.mailfrom=lkp@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 441E8140010 X-HE-Tag: 1643306230-456383 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Shiyang, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on linux/master] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.17-rc1 next-20220127] [cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220127-204239 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2c271fe77d52a0555161926c232cd5bc07178b39 config: ia64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220128/202201280101.4ECasWmD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/cb7650562991fc273fbf4c53b6e3db4bb9bb0b5e git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Shiyang-Ruan/fsdax-introduce-fs-query-to-support-reflink/20220127-204239 git checkout cb7650562991fc273fbf4c53b6e3db4bb9bb0b5e # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/xfs/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h:14, from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:80, from fs/xfs/xfs.h:22, from fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:6: include/linux/dax.h:73:30: warning: 'struct dax_holder_operations' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 73 | const struct dax_holder_operations *ops) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:220:14: error: variable 'xfs_dax_holder_operations' has initializer but incomplete type 220 | const struct dax_holder_operations xfs_dax_holder_operations = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:10: error: 'const struct dax_holder_operations' has no member named 'notify_failure' 221 | .notify_failure = xfs_dax_notify_failure, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:35: warning: excess elements in struct initializer 221 | .notify_failure = xfs_dax_notify_failure, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:221:35: note: (near initialization for 'xfs_dax_holder_operations') fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c:220:36: error: storage size of 'xfs_dax_holder_operations' isn't known 220 | const struct dax_holder_operations xfs_dax_holder_operations = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +221 fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c 219 220 const struct dax_holder_operations xfs_dax_holder_operations = { > 221 .notify_failure = xfs_dax_notify_failure, --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org