linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <zi.yan@sent.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 5/8] mm: page_isolation: check specified range for unmovable pages during isolation.
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 16:47:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105214756.91065-6-zi.yan@sent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220105214756.91065-1-zi.yan@sent.com>

From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>

Enable set_migratetype_isolate() to check specified sub-range for
unmovable pages during isolation. Page isolation is done
at max(MAX_ORDER_NR_PAEGS, pageblock_nr_pages) granularity, but not all
pages within that granularity are intended to be isolated. For example,
alloc_contig_range(), which uses page isolation, allows ranges without
alignment. This commit makes unmovable page check only look for
interesting pages, so that page isolation can succeed for any
non-overlapping ranges.

has_unmovable_pages() is moved to mm/page_isolation.c since it is only
used by page isolation.

Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/page-isolation.h |   3 +-
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  12 ++-
 mm/page_alloc.c                | 122 +--------------------------
 mm/page_isolation.c            | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index 572458016331..a4d2687ed4e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
 #define MEMORY_OFFLINE	0x1
 #define REPORT_FAILURE	0x2
 
-struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
-				 int migratetype, int flags);
 void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
 int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
 				int migratetype, int *num_movable);
@@ -44,6 +42,7 @@ int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
  */
 int
 start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
+			 unsigned long isolate_start, unsigned long isolate_end,
 			 unsigned migratetype, int flags);
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 0139b77c51d5..5db84c3fa882 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1901,8 +1901,18 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
 	zone_pcp_disable(zone);
 	lru_cache_disable();
 
-	/* set above range as isolated */
+	/*
+	 * set above range as isolated
+	 *
+	 * start_pfn and end_pfn are the same as isolate_start and isolate_end,
+	 * because start_pfn and end_pfn are already PAGES_PER_SECTION
+	 * (>= MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) aligned; if start_pfn is
+	 * pageblock_nr_pages aligned in memmap_on_memory case, there is no
+	 * need to isolate pages before start_pfn, since they are used by
+	 * memmap thus not user visible.
+	 */
 	ret = start_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, end_pfn,
+				       start_pfn, end_pfn,
 				       MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
 				       MEMORY_OFFLINE | REPORT_FAILURE);
 	if (ret) {
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e1c09ae54e31..faee7637740a 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -8864,125 +8864,6 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
 	return table;
 }
 
-/*
- * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not.
- *
- * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
- * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
- * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
- * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
- *
- * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to
- * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it
- * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently.
- *
- */
-struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
-				 int migratetype, int flags)
-{
-	unsigned long iter = 0;
-	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
-	unsigned long offset = pfn % pageblock_nr_pages;
-
-	if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
-		/*
-		 * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark
-		 * isolate CMA pageblocks even when they are not movable in fact
-		 * so consider them movable here.
-		 */
-		if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
-			return NULL;
-
-		return page;
-	}
-
-	for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages - offset; iter++) {
-		page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
-
-		/*
-		 * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked
-		 * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable
-		 * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when
-		 * specifying "movablecore".
-		 */
-		if (PageReserved(page))
-			return page;
-
-		/*
-		 * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved
-		 * pages then it should be reasonably safe to assume the rest
-		 * is movable.
-		 */
-		if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
-		 * THPs are on the LRU, but need to be counted as #small pages.
-		 * We need not scan over tail pages because we don't
-		 * handle each tail page individually in migration.
-		 */
-		if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransCompound(page)) {
-			struct page *head = compound_head(page);
-			unsigned int skip_pages;
-
-			if (PageHuge(page)) {
-				if (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(head)))
-					return page;
-			} else if (!PageLRU(head) && !__PageMovable(head)) {
-				return page;
-			}
-
-			skip_pages = compound_nr(head) - (page - head);
-			iter += skip_pages - 1;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * We can't use page_count without pin a page
-		 * because another CPU can free compound page.
-		 * This check already skips compound tails of THP
-		 * because their page->_refcount is zero at all time.
-		 */
-		if (!page_ref_count(page)) {
-			if (PageBuddy(page))
-				iter += (1 << buddy_order(page)) - 1;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and
-		 * page_count() is not 0.
-		 */
-		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * We treat all PageOffline() pages as movable when offlining
-		 * to give drivers a chance to decrement their reference count
-		 * in MEM_GOING_OFFLINE in order to indicate that these pages
-		 * can be offlined as there are no direct references anymore.
-		 * For actually unmovable PageOffline() where the driver does
-		 * not support this, we will fail later when trying to actually
-		 * move these pages that still have a reference count > 0.
-		 * (false negatives in this function only)
-		 */
-		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageOffline(page))
-			continue;
-
-		if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
-		 * it.  But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
-		 * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed.
-		 */
-		return page;
-	}
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
 static unsigned long pfn_max_align_down(unsigned long pfn)
 {
@@ -9226,7 +9107,8 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
 	 * put back to page allocator so that buddy can use them.
 	 */
 
-	ret = start_isolate_page_range(isolate_start, isolate_end, migratetype, 0);
+	ret = start_isolate_page_range(start, end, isolate_start, isolate_end,
+				       migratetype, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		goto done;
 
diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 6a0ddda6b3c5..7a7991460eb9 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -15,12 +15,143 @@
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/page_isolation.h>
 
-static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_flags)
+/*
+ * This function checks whether pageblock within [start_pfn, end_pfn) includes
+ * unmovable pages or not.
+ *
+ * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
+ * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
+ * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
+ * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
+ *
+ * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to
+ * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it
+ * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently.
+ *
+ */
+static struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
+				 int migratetype, int flags,
+				 unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+	unsigned long first_pfn = max(page_to_pfn(page), start_pfn);
+	unsigned long pfn = first_pfn;
+	unsigned long last_pfn = min(ALIGN(pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages), end_pfn);
+
+	page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+
+	if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
+		/*
+		 * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark
+		 * isolate CMA pageblocks even when they are not movable in fact
+		 * so consider them movable here.
+		 */
+		if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
+			return NULL;
+
+		return page;
+	}
+
+	for (pfn = first_pfn; pfn < last_pfn; pfn++) {
+		page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
+
+		/*
+		 * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked
+		 * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable
+		 * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when
+		 * specifying "movablecore".
+		 */
+		if (PageReserved(page))
+			return page;
+
+		/*
+		 * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved
+		 * pages then it should be reasonably safe to assume the rest
+		 * is movable.
+		 */
+		if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
+		 * THPs are on the LRU, but need to be counted as #small pages.
+		 * We need not scan over tail pages because we don't
+		 * handle each tail page individually in migration.
+		 */
+		if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransCompound(page)) {
+			struct page *head = compound_head(page);
+			unsigned int skip_pages;
+
+			if (PageHuge(page)) {
+				if (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(head)))
+					return page;
+			} else if (!PageLRU(head) && !__PageMovable(head)) {
+				return page;
+			}
+
+			skip_pages = compound_nr(head) - (page - head);
+			pfn += skip_pages - 1;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * We can't use page_count without pin a page
+		 * because another CPU can free compound page.
+		 * This check already skips compound tails of THP
+		 * because their page->_refcount is zero at all time.
+		 */
+		if (!page_ref_count(page)) {
+			if (PageBuddy(page))
+				pfn += (1 << buddy_order(page)) - 1;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and
+		 * page_count() is not 0.
+		 */
+		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * We treat all PageOffline() pages as movable when offlining
+		 * to give drivers a chance to decrement their reference count
+		 * in MEM_GOING_OFFLINE in order to indicate that these pages
+		 * can be offlined as there are no direct references anymore.
+		 * For actually unmovable PageOffline() where the driver does
+		 * not support this, we will fail later when trying to actually
+		 * move these pages that still have a reference count > 0.
+		 * (false negatives in this function only)
+		 */
+		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageOffline(page))
+			continue;
+
+		if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
+		 * it.  But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
+		 * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed.
+		 */
+		return page;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function set pageblock migratetype to isolate if no unmovable page is
+ * present in [start_pfn, end_pfn). The pageblock must be within
+ * [start_pfn, end_pfn).
+ */
+static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_flags,
+			unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
 {
 	struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
 	struct page *unmovable;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	VM_BUG_ON(page_to_pfn(page) < start_pfn || page_to_pfn(page) >= end_pfn);
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -37,7 +168,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_
 	 * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
 	 * We just check MOVABLE pages.
 	 */
-	unmovable = has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags);
+	unmovable = has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags, start_pfn, end_pfn);
 	if (!unmovable) {
 		unsigned long nr_pages;
 		int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
@@ -185,20 +316,19 @@ __first_valid_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
  * Return: 0 on success and -EBUSY if any part of range cannot be isolated.
  */
 int start_isolate_page_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
+			     unsigned long isolate_start, unsigned long isolate_end,
 			     unsigned migratetype, int flags)
 {
 	unsigned long pfn;
 	struct page *page;
 
-	BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages));
-	BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages));
-
-	for (pfn = start_pfn;
-	     pfn < end_pfn;
+	for (pfn = isolate_start;
+	     pfn < isolate_end;
 	     pfn += pageblock_nr_pages) {
 		page = __first_valid_page(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages);
-		if (page && set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, flags)) {
-			undo_isolate_page_range(start_pfn, pfn, migratetype);
+		if (page && set_migratetype_isolate(page, migratetype, flags,
+					start_pfn, end_pfn)) {
+			undo_isolate_page_range(isolate_start, pfn, migratetype);
 			return -EBUSY;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-05 21:47 [RFC PATCH v3 0/8] Use pageblock_order for cma and alloc_contig_range alignment Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] mm: page_alloc: avoid merging non-fallbackable pageblocks with others Zi Yan
2022-01-12 10:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 11:36     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-13 12:28       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 14:50         ` Zi Yan
2022-01-13 14:49     ` Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/8] mm: compaction: handle non-lru compound pages properly in isolate_migratepages_block() Zi Yan
2022-01-12 11:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 14:57     ` Zi Yan
2022-01-13 16:23       ` Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/8] mm: migrate: allocate the right size of non hugetlb or THP compound pages Zi Yan
2022-01-12 11:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 15:46     ` Zi Yan
2022-01-13 15:50       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/8] mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2022-01-14 13:38   ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/8] mm: page_isolation: check specified range for unmovable pages during isolation David Hildenbrand
2022-01-14 15:14     ` Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] mm: cma: use pageblock_order as the single alignment Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/8] drivers: virtio_mem: use pageblock size as the minimum virtio_mem size Zi Yan
2022-01-14 13:44   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-14 15:15     ` Zi Yan
2022-01-05 21:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/8] arch: powerpc: adjust fadump alignment to be pageblock aligned Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105214756.91065-6-zi.yan@sent.com \
    --to=zi.yan@sent.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=renzhengeek@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox