From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@lst.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when no managed pages
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211213074721.GB20758@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2112070859420.201880@gentwo.de>
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:05:26AM +0100, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021, Baoquan He wrote:
>
> > into ZONE_DMA32 by default. The zone DMA covering low 16M is used to
> > take care of antique ISA devices. In fact, on 64bit system, it rarely
> > need ZONE_DMA (which is low 16M) to support almost extinct ISA devices.
> > However, some components treat DMA as a generic concept, e.g
> > kmalloc-dma, slab allocator initializes it for later any DMA related
> > buffer allocation, but not limited to ISA DMA.
>
> The idea of the slab allocator DMA support is to have memory available
> for devices that can only support a limited range of physical addresses.
> These are only to be enabled for platforms that have such requirements.
>
> The slab allocators guarantee that all kmalloc allocations are DMA able
> indepent of specifying ZONE_DMA/ZONE_DMA32
Yes. And we never supported slab for ZONE_DMA32 and should work on
getting rid of it for ZONE_DMA as well. The only thing that guarantees
device addressability is the DMA API. The DMA API needs ZONE_DMA/DMA32
to back its page allocations, but supporting this in slab is a bad idea
only explained by historic reasons from before when we had a DMA API.
> > On arm64, even though both CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
> > are enabled, it makes ZONE_DMA covers the low 4G area, and ZONE_DMA32
> > empty. Unless on specific platforms (e.g. 30-bit on Raspberry Pi 4),
> > then zone DMA covers the 1st 1G area, zone DMA32 covers the rest of
> > the 32-bit addressable memory.
>
> ZONE_NORMAL should cover all memory. ARM does not need ZONE_DMA32.
arm32 not, arm64 does. And the Pi 4 is an arm64 device.
> > I am wondering if we can also change the size of DMA and DMA32 ZONE as
> > dynamically adjusted, just as arm64 is doing? On x86_64, we can make
> > zone DMA covers the 32-bit addressable memory, and empty zone DMA32 by
> > default. Once ISA_DMA_API is enabled, we go back to make zone DMA covers
> > low 16M area, zone DMA32 covers the rest of 32-bit addressable memory.
> > (I am not familiar with ISA_DMA_API, will it require 24-bit addressable
> > memory when enabled?)
>
> The size of ZONE_DMA is traditionally depending on the platform. On some
> it is 16MB, on some 1G and on some 4GB. ZONE32 is always 4GB and should
> only be used if ZONE_DMA has already been used.
ZONE32 should be (and generally is) used whenever there is zone covering
the 32-bit CPU physical address limit.
>
> ZONE_DMA is dynamic in the sense of being different on different
> platforms.
Agreed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-07 3:07 Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/5] docs: kernel-parameters: Update to reflect the current default size of atomic pool Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:53 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07 3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] dma-pool: allow user to disable " Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:53 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-13 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-13 8:16 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/5] mm_zone: add function to check if managed dma zone exists Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:53 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-09 13:02 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-09 13:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-09 13:23 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 4/5] dma/pool: create dma atomic pool only if dma zone has managed pages Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:54 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07 3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 5/5] mm/slub: do not create dma-kmalloc if no managed pages in DMA zone Baoquan He
2021-12-07 3:54 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07 3:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when no managed pages Baoquan He
2021-12-07 4:03 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-08 4:33 ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-08 4:56 ` John Donnelly
2021-12-13 3:54 ` Baoquan He
[not found] ` <YbdJ00wRFvi0aqze@zn.tnic>
2021-12-13 14:03 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07 8:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-12-09 8:05 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-09 12:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-12-13 7:39 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-13 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211213074721.GB20758@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=John.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox