linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@lst.de, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, vbabka@suse.cz, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
	John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/5] mm_zone: add function to check if managed dma zone exists
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:02:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211209130210.GB3050@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a9bc228-21ba-abe3-d9c8-b9d52b936366@redhat.com>

On 12/07/21 at 12:23pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.12.21 04:07, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In some places of the current kernel, it assumes that dma zone must have
> > managed pages if CONFIG_ZONE_DMA is enabled. While this is not always true.
> > E.g in kdump kernel of x86_64, only low 1M is presented and locked down
> > at very early stage of boot, so that there's no managed pages at all in
> > DMA zone. This exception will always cause page allocation failure if page
> > is requested from DMA zone.
> > 
> > Here add function has_managed_dma() and the relevant helper functions to
> > check if there's DMA zone with managed pages. It will be used in later
> > patches.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mmzone.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/page_alloc.c        | 11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 58e744b78c2c..82d23e13e0e5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -998,6 +998,18 @@ static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(struct zone *zone)
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> > +static inline bool zone_is_dma(struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +	return zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_DMA;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool zone_is_dma(struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Returns true if a zone has pages managed by the buddy allocator.
> >   * All the reclaim decisions have to use this function rather than
> > @@ -1046,6 +1058,7 @@ static inline int is_highmem_idx(enum zone_type idx)
> >  #endif
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool has_managed_dma(void);
> >  /**
> >   * is_highmem - helper function to quickly check if a struct zone is a
> >   *              highmem zone or not.  This is an attempt to keep references
> > @@ -1131,6 +1144,14 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone);
> >  			; /* do nothing */		\
> >  		else
> >  
> > +#define for_each_managed_zone(zone)		        \
> > +	for (zone = (first_online_pgdat())->node_zones; \
> > +	     zone;					\
> > +	     zone = next_zone(zone))			\
> > +		if (!managed_zone(zone))		\
> > +			; /* do nothing */		\
> > +		else
> > +
> >  static inline struct zone *zonelist_zone(struct zoneref *zoneref)
> >  {
> >  	return zoneref->zone;
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index c5952749ad40..ac0ea42a4e5f 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -9459,4 +9459,15 @@ bool take_page_off_buddy(struct page *page)
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > +
> > +bool has_managed_dma(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct zone *zone;
> > +
> > +	for_each_managed_zone(zone) {
> > +		if (zone_is_dma(zone))
> > +			return true;
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> Wouldn't it be "easier/faster" to just iterate online nodes and directly
> obtain the ZONE_DMA, checking if there are managed pages?

Thanks, Dave.

Please check for_each_managed_zone(), it is iterating online nodes and
it's each managed zone. 

Is below what you are suggesting? The only difference is I introduced
for_each_managed_zone() which can be reused later if needed. Not sure if
I got your suggestion correctly.

bool has_managed_dma(void)
{
        struct pglist_data *pgdat;
        struct zone *zone;
        enum zone_type i, j;

        for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
                for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_ZONES - 1; i++) {          
                        struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[i];
                        if (zone_is_dma(zone))                                                                                                    
                                return true;
                }
        }
        return false;

}



  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-09 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-07  3:07 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when no managed pages Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/5] docs: kernel-parameters: Update to reflect the current default size of atomic pool Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:53   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07  3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/5] dma-pool: allow user to disable " Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:53   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-13  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-13  8:16     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/5] mm_zone: add function to check if managed dma zone exists Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:53   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07 11:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-09 13:02     ` Baoquan He [this message]
2021-12-09 13:10       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-12-09 13:23         ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 4/5] dma/pool: create dma atomic pool only if dma zone has managed pages Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:54   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07  3:07 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 5/5] mm/slub: do not create dma-kmalloc if no managed pages in DMA zone Baoquan He
2021-12-07  3:54   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-07  3:16 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 0/5] Avoid requesting page from DMA zone when no managed pages Baoquan He
2021-12-07  4:03   ` John Donnelly
2021-12-08  4:33     ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-08  4:56       ` John Donnelly
2021-12-13  3:54     ` Baoquan He
     [not found]   ` <YbdJ00wRFvi0aqze@zn.tnic>
2021-12-13 14:03     ` Baoquan He
2021-12-07  8:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-12-09  8:05   ` Baoquan He
2021-12-09 12:59     ` Christoph Lameter
2021-12-13  7:39       ` Baoquan He
2021-12-13  7:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-13  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211209130210.GB3050@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=John.p.donnelly@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox