linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, brendanhiggins@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size
Date: Wed,  1 Dec 2021 15:04:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201150440.1088-1-sj@kernel.org>

On some configuration[1], 'damon_test_split_evenly()' kunit test
function has >1024 bytes frame size, so below build warning is
triggered:

      CC      mm/damon/vaddr.o
    In file included from mm/damon/vaddr.c:672:
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h: In function 'damon_test_split_evenly':
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h:309:1: warning: the frame size of 1064 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
      309 | }
          | ^

This commit fixes the warning by separating the common logics in the
function.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202111182146.OV3C4uGr-lkp@intel.com/

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
 mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
index ecfd0b2ed222..3097ef9c662a 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -252,59 +252,62 @@ static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
 			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
 }
 
-static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
+		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
 {
-	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
-	struct damon_target *t;
-	struct damon_region *r;
-	unsigned long i;
-
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
-			-EINVAL);
-
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 0), -EINVAL);
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
 
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 10), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	}
+
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
+	unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+	unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
+	unsigned long i = 0;
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 5), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		if (i == 4)
+		if (i == nr_pieces - 1)
 			break;
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+				r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
 	}
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
-	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 2), -EINVAL);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+			-EINVAL);
+
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
 
-	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul);
-	}
-	damon_free_target(t);
 	damon_destroy_ctx(c);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-01 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-01 15:04 [PATCH 00/11] mm/damon: Trivial fixups and improvements SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/damon/core: Use better timer mechanisms selection threshold SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/damon/dbgfs: Remove an unnecessary error message SeongJae Park
2021-12-08  6:29   ` Xin Hao
2021-12-08 12:49     ` SeongJae Park
2021-12-08 15:13       ` Xin Hao
2021-12-08 16:48         ` SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/damon/core: Remove unnecessary error messages SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/damon/vaddr: Remove an unnecessary warning message SeongJae Park
2021-12-03  3:01   ` Muchun Song
2021-12-03 20:44     ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-04  2:37       ` Muchun Song
2021-12-01 15:04 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Remove unnecessary variables SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/11] selftests/damon: Skip test if DAMON is running SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/11] selftests/damon: Test DAMON enabling with empty target_ids case SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/11] selftests/damon: Test wrong DAMOS condition ranges input SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] selftests/damon: Test debugfs file reads/writes with huge count SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] selftests/damon: Split test cases SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox