From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, brendanhiggins@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:04:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201150440.1088-1-sj@kernel.org>
On some configuration[1], 'damon_test_split_evenly()' kunit test
function has >1024 bytes frame size, so below build warning is
triggered:
CC mm/damon/vaddr.o
In file included from mm/damon/vaddr.c:672:
mm/damon/vaddr-test.h: In function 'damon_test_split_evenly':
mm/damon/vaddr-test.h:309:1: warning: the frame size of 1064 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
309 | }
| ^
This commit fixes the warning by separating the common logics in the
function.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202111182146.OV3C4uGr-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
---
mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
index ecfd0b2ed222..3097ef9c662a 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -252,59 +252,62 @@ static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
}
-static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
{
- struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
- struct damon_target *t;
- struct damon_region *r;
- unsigned long i;
-
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
- -EINVAL);
-
- t = damon_new_target(42);
- r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 0), -EINVAL);
+ struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+ struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
damon_add_region(r, t);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 10), 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
- i = 0;
damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
}
+
damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+ struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+ struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+ unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
+ unsigned long i = 0;
- t = damon_new_target(42);
- r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
damon_add_region(r, t);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 5), 0);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);
- i = 0;
damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
- if (i == 4)
+ if (i == nr_pieces - 1)
break;
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
}
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
damon_free_target(t);
+}
- t = damon_new_target(42);
- r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
- damon_add_region(r, t);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 2), -EINVAL);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+ -EINVAL);
+
+ damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+ damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
- damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul);
- }
- damon_free_target(t);
damon_destroy_ctx(c);
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-01 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-01 15:04 [PATCH 00/11] mm/damon: Trivial fixups and improvements SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/damon/core: Use better timer mechanisms selection threshold SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/damon/dbgfs: Remove an unnecessary error message SeongJae Park
2021-12-08 6:29 ` Xin Hao
2021-12-08 12:49 ` SeongJae Park
2021-12-08 15:13 ` Xin Hao
2021-12-08 16:48 ` SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/damon/core: Remove unnecessary error messages SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/damon/vaddr: Remove an unnecessary warning message SeongJae Park
2021-12-03 3:01 ` Muchun Song
2021-12-03 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-04 2:37 ` Muchun Song
2021-12-01 15:04 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Remove unnecessary variables SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/11] selftests/damon: Skip test if DAMON is running SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/11] selftests/damon: Test DAMON enabling with empty target_ids case SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/11] selftests/damon: Test wrong DAMOS condition ranges input SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] selftests/damon: Test debugfs file reads/writes with huge count SeongJae Park
2021-12-01 15:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] selftests/damon: Split test cases SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox