From: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
To: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org,
dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com, hughsient@gmail.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com,
Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:34:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124203459.4578-4-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124203459.4578-1-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
Add a new member in e820_entry to hold whether an entry is able to do
hardware memory encryption or not.
Add a new argument to __e820__range_add to accept this new
crypto_capable.
Add a new argument to __e820__update_range to be able to change a
region's crypto_capable member. Also, change its behavior a little,
before if you wanted to update a region with its same type it was a
BUG_ON; now if you call it with both old_type and new_type equals,
then the function won't change the types, just crypto_capable.
Change e820__update_table to handle merging and overlap problems
taking into account crypto_capable.
Add a function to mark a range as crypto, using __e820__range_update
in the background. This will be called when initializing EFI.
Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h
index e8f58ddd06d9..fdfe1c37dcfc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/api.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ extern bool e820__mapped_all(u64 start, u64 end, enum e820_type type);
extern void e820__range_add (u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type);
extern u64 e820__range_update(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type);
extern u64 e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool check_type);
+extern u64 e820__range_mark_as_crypto(u64 start, u64 size);
extern void e820__print_table(char *who);
extern int e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h
index 314f75d886d0..7b510dffd3b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820/types.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct e820_entry {
u64 addr;
u64 size;
enum e820_type type;
+ u8 crypto_capable;
} __attribute__((packed));
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index bc0657f0deed..4581598690a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int e820__get_entry_type(u64 start, u64 end)
/*
* Add a memory region to the kernel E820 map.
*/
-static void __init __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
+static void __init __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type, u8 crypto_capable)
{
int x = table->nr_entries;
@@ -176,12 +176,13 @@ static void __init __e820__range_add(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 si
table->entries[x].addr = start;
table->entries[x].size = size;
table->entries[x].type = type;
+ table->entries[x].crypto_capable = crypto_capable;
table->nr_entries++;
}
void __init e820__range_add(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type type)
{
- __e820__range_add(e820_table, start, size, type);
+ __e820__range_add(e820_table, start, size, type, 0);
}
static void __init e820_print_type(enum e820_type type)
@@ -211,6 +212,8 @@ void __init e820__print_table(char *who)
e820_table->entries[i].addr + e820_table->entries[i].size - 1);
e820_print_type(e820_table->entries[i].type);
+ if (e820_table->entries[i].crypto_capable)
+ pr_cont("; crypto-capable");
pr_cont("\n");
}
}
@@ -327,6 +330,7 @@ int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
unsigned long long last_addr;
u32 new_nr_entries, overlap_entries;
u32 i, chg_idx, chg_nr;
+ u8 current_crypto, last_crypto;
/* If there's only one memory region, don't bother: */
if (table->nr_entries < 2)
@@ -367,6 +371,7 @@ int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
new_nr_entries = 0; /* Index for creating new map entries */
last_type = 0; /* Start with undefined memory type */
last_addr = 0; /* Start with 0 as last starting address */
+ last_crypto = 0;
/* Loop through change-points, determining effect on the new map: */
for (chg_idx = 0; chg_idx < chg_nr; chg_idx++) {
@@ -388,13 +393,17 @@ int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
* 1=usable, 2,3,4,4+=unusable)
*/
current_type = 0;
+ current_crypto = 1;
for (i = 0; i < overlap_entries; i++) {
+ current_crypto = current_crypto && overlap_list[i]->crypto_capable;
if (overlap_list[i]->type > current_type)
current_type = overlap_list[i]->type;
}
/* Continue building up new map based on this information: */
- if (current_type != last_type || e820_nomerge(current_type)) {
+ if (current_type != last_type ||
+ current_crypto != last_crypto ||
+ e820_nomerge(current_type)) {
if (last_type != 0) {
new_entries[new_nr_entries].size = change_point[chg_idx]->addr - last_addr;
/* Move forward only if the new size was non-zero: */
@@ -406,9 +415,12 @@ int __init e820__update_table(struct e820_table *table)
if (current_type != 0) {
new_entries[new_nr_entries].addr = change_point[chg_idx]->addr;
new_entries[new_nr_entries].type = current_type;
+ new_entries[new_nr_entries].crypto_capable = current_crypto;
+
last_addr = change_point[chg_idx]->addr;
}
last_type = current_type;
+ last_crypto = current_crypto;
}
}
@@ -459,14 +471,20 @@ static int __init append_e820_table(struct boot_e820_entry *entries, u32 nr_entr
return __append_e820_table(entries, nr_entries);
}
+/*
+ * Update a memory range.
+ *
+ * If old_type and new_type are the same then ignore the types and
+ * just change crypto_capable.
+ */
static u64 __init
-__e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
+__e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type, u8 crypto_capable)
{
u64 end;
unsigned int i;
u64 real_updated_size = 0;
- BUG_ON(old_type == new_type);
+ bool update_crypto = new_type == old_type;
if (size > (ULLONG_MAX - start))
size = ULLONG_MAX - start;
@@ -476,6 +494,8 @@ __e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_ty
e820_print_type(old_type);
pr_cont(" ==> ");
e820_print_type(new_type);
+ if (crypto_capable)
+ pr_cont("; crypto-capable");
pr_cont("\n");
for (i = 0; i < table->nr_entries; i++) {
@@ -483,22 +503,27 @@ __e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_ty
u64 final_start, final_end;
u64 entry_end;
- if (entry->type != old_type)
+ if (entry->type != old_type && !update_crypto)
continue;
+ if (update_crypto)
+ new_type = entry->type;
+
entry_end = entry->addr + entry->size;
/* Completely covered by new range? */
if (entry->addr >= start && entry_end <= end) {
entry->type = new_type;
+ entry->crypto_capable = crypto_capable;
real_updated_size += entry->size;
continue;
}
/* New range is completely covered? */
if (entry->addr < start && entry_end > end) {
- __e820__range_add(table, start, size, new_type);
- __e820__range_add(table, end, entry_end - end, entry->type);
+ __e820__range_add(table, start, size, new_type, crypto_capable);
+ __e820__range_add(table, end, entry_end - end,
+ entry->type, entry->crypto_capable);
entry->size = start - entry->addr;
real_updated_size += size;
continue;
@@ -510,7 +535,8 @@ __e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_ty
if (final_start >= final_end)
continue;
- __e820__range_add(table, final_start, final_end - final_start, new_type);
+ __e820__range_add(table, final_start, final_end - final_start,
+ new_type, crypto_capable);
real_updated_size += final_end - final_start;
@@ -527,14 +553,19 @@ __e820__range_update(struct e820_table *table, u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_ty
return real_updated_size;
}
+u64 __init e820__range_mark_as_crypto(u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+ return __e820__range_update(e820_table, start, size, 0, 0, true);
+}
+
u64 __init e820__range_update(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
{
- return __e820__range_update(e820_table, start, size, old_type, new_type);
+ return __e820__range_update(e820_table, start, size, old_type, new_type, false);
}
static u64 __init e820__range_update_kexec(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, enum e820_type new_type)
{
- return __e820__range_update(e820_table_kexec, start, size, old_type, new_type);
+ return __e820__range_update(e820_table_kexec, start, size, old_type, new_type, false);
}
/* Remove a range of memory from the E820 table: */
@@ -573,6 +604,9 @@ u64 __init e820__range_remove(u64 start, u64 size, enum e820_type old_type, bool
/* Is the new range completely covered? */
if (entry->addr < start && entry_end > end) {
e820__range_add(end, entry_end - end, entry->type);
+ if (entry->crypto_capable)
+ e820__range_mark_as_crypto(end, entry_end - end);
+
entry->size = start - entry->addr;
real_removed_size += size;
continue;
@@ -1322,6 +1356,8 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
continue;
memblock_add(entry->addr, entry->size);
+ if (entry->crypto_capable)
+ memblock_mark_crypto_capable(entry->addr, entry->size);
}
/* Throw away partial pages: */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-24 20:34 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Martin Fernandez
2021-11-24 20:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2021-11-24 20:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/mmzone: Tag pg_data_t " Martin Fernandez
2021-11-24 20:34 ` Martin Fernandez [this message]
2021-11-25 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry " Dov Murik
2021-11-25 18:12 ` Martin Fernandez
2021-11-24 20:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/efi: Tag e820_entries as crypto capable from EFI memmap Martin Fernandez
2021-11-24 20:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211124203459.4578-4-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--to=martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox