From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jordy Zomer <jordy@pwning.systems>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] secretmem: Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to zero
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:29:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110251225.D01841AE67@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025181634.3889666-1-willy@infradead.org>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:16:34PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Commit 110860541f44 ("mm/secretmem: use refcount_t instead of atomic_t")
> attempted to fix the problem of secretmem_users wrapping to zero and
> allowing suspend once again. Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to
> zero by forbidding new users if the number of users has wrapped from
> positive to negative. This stops a long way short of reaching the
> necessary 4 billion users, so there's no need to be clever with special
> anti-wrap types or checking the return value from atomic_inc().
I still prefer refcount_t here because it provides deterministic
saturation, but the risk right now is so narrow ("don't hibernate"),
I'm not going to fight for it. I think it'd be fine to use it initialized
to 1, and have the removal check for == 0 as a failure state, which would
deterministically cover the underflow case too.
-Kees
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jordy Zomer <jordy@pwning.systems>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> mm/secretmem.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c
> index 030f02ddc7c1..c2dda408bb36 100644
> --- a/mm/secretmem.c
> +++ b/mm/secretmem.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(memfd_secret, unsigned int, flags)
>
> if (flags & ~(SECRETMEM_FLAGS_MASK | O_CLOEXEC))
> return -EINVAL;
> + if (atomic_read(&secretmem_users) < 0)
> + return -ENFILE;
>
> fd = get_unused_fd_flags(flags & O_CLOEXEC);
> if (fd < 0)
> --
> 2.33.0
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 18:16 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-10-25 19:29 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-10-25 19:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-25 21:04 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-25 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-25 22:30 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-25 23:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 0:17 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26 1:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 1:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202110251225.D01841AE67@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jordy@pwning.systems \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox