From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: simplify bdi refcounting
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:02:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211022090203.GF1026@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021124441.668816-6-hch@lst.de>
On Thu 21-10-21 14:44:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move grabbing and releasing the bdi refcount out of the common
> wb_init/wb_exit helpers into code that is only used for the non-default
> memcg driven bdi_writeback structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Can we perhaps add a comment to struct bdi_writeback definition (or maybe
wb_init()?) mentioning that it holds a reference to 'bdi' if it is
bdi_writeback struct for a cgroup? I don't see it mentioned anywhere and
now that you've changed the code, it isn't that obvious from the code
either... Otherwise the patch looks good so feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> mm/backing-dev.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> index 768e9ae489f66..5ccb250898083 100644
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -291,8 +291,6 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>
> memset(wb, 0, sizeof(*wb));
>
> - if (wb != &bdi->wb)
> - bdi_get(bdi);
> wb->bdi = bdi;
> wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_dirty);
> @@ -316,7 +314,7 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>
> err = fprop_local_init_percpu(&wb->completions, gfp);
> if (err)
> - goto out_put_bdi;
> + return err;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_WB_STAT_ITEMS; i++) {
> err = percpu_counter_init(&wb->stat[i], 0, gfp);
> @@ -330,9 +328,6 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> while (i--)
> percpu_counter_destroy(&wb->stat[i]);
> fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->completions);
> -out_put_bdi:
> - if (wb != &bdi->wb)
> - bdi_put(bdi);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -373,8 +368,6 @@ static void wb_exit(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> percpu_counter_destroy(&wb->stat[i]);
>
> fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->completions);
> - if (wb != &wb->bdi->wb)
> - bdi_put(wb->bdi);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
> @@ -397,6 +390,7 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> struct bdi_writeback *wb = container_of(work, struct bdi_writeback,
> release_work);
> struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(wb->blkcg_css);
> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
>
> mutex_lock(&wb->bdi->cgwb_release_mutex);
> wb_shutdown(wb);
> @@ -416,6 +410,7 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>
> percpu_ref_exit(&wb->refcnt);
> wb_exit(wb);
> + bdi_put(bdi);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&wb->b_attached));
> kfree_rcu(wb, rcu);
> }
> @@ -497,6 +492,7 @@ static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_attached);
> INIT_WORK(&wb->release_work, cgwb_release_workfn);
> set_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state);
> + bdi_get(bdi);
>
> /*
> * The root wb determines the registered state of the whole bdi and
> @@ -528,6 +524,7 @@ static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> goto out_put;
>
> err_fprop_exit:
> + bdi_put(bdi);
> fprop_local_destroy_percpu(&wb->memcg_completions);
> err_ref_exit:
> percpu_ref_exit(&wb->refcnt);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 12:44 simplify bdi unregistation Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-21 12:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: export bdi_unregister Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-22 8:41 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 12:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: call bdi_unregister explicitly Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-22 8:43 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 12:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: explicitly unregister per-superblock BDIs Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-22 8:48 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 12:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: don't automatically unregister bdis Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-22 8:51 ` Jan Kara
2021-10-21 12:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: simplify bdi refcounting Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-22 9:02 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-10-27 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-27 9:47 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211022090203.GF1026@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox