From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, slab: Reduce space complexity of alien_cache using rbtree
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:18:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211005131838.GA2760@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110041601170.294708@gentwo.de>
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:05:23PM +0200, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
>
> > As remote node allocation isn't that frequent and better avoided,
> > this patch tries to compromise some execution time for memory usage.
>
> Remote node allocation is typical for large memory loads and essential to
> balance the memory allocation over multiple nodes. Large NUMA systems
> exist because the memory requirements of the application cannot be
> satisfied by what a single node has to offer and usually code threads from
> multiple nodes may access remote memory.
>
> > Remove init_reap_node, next_reap_node and related variables
> > introduced by commit 8fce4d8e3b9e ("[PATCH] slab: Node rotor for freeing
> > alien caches and remote per cpu pages."), Because it has only one tree
> > for all remote nodes.
>
> Rotors to spread the memory allocated are essential for the performance
> of large memory loads! Memory must be spread evenly otherwise memory
> accesses will overload a single node.
Sorry for making a noise. It was because I misunderstood NUMA.
Thought it should be not frequent because kernel's default memory allocation policy was
allocating from local node.
It would have been better If I asked why it uses much memory first, not writing code.
I'll be more careful next time. Thank you for reviewing!
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-03 5:17 Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-10-04 5:38 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2021-10-04 14:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-10-05 13:18 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211005131838.GA2760@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.de \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox