From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasarya <surenb@google.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/madvise: support process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 09:12:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210926161259.238054-1-namit@vmware.com> (raw)
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
The goal of these patches is to add support for
process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED). Yet, in the process some (arguably)
useful cleanups, a bug fix and performance enhancements are performed.
The patches try to consolidate the logic across different behaviors, and
to a certain extent overlap/conflict with an outstanding patch that does
something similar [1]. This consolidation however is mostly orthogonal
to the aforementioned one and done in order to clarify what is done in
respect to locks and TLB for each behavior and to batch these operations
more efficiently on process_madvise().
process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) is useful for two reasons: (a) it allows
userfaultfd monitors to unmap memory from monitored processes; and (b)
it is more efficient than madvise() since it is vectored and batches TLB
flushes more aggressively.
The first three patches should not interfere with the outstanding patch
[1]. The rest might need to be rebased after [1] is applied.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAJuCfpFDBJ_W1y2tqAT4BGtPbWrjjDud_JuKO8ZbnjYfeVNvRg@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasarya <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Nadav Amit (8):
mm/madvise: propagate vma->vm_end changes
mm/madvise: remove unnecessary check on madvise_dontneed_free()
mm/madvise: remove unnecessary checks on madvise_free_single_vma()
mm/madvise: define madvise behavior in a struct
mm/madvise: perform certain operations once on process_madvise()
mm/madvise: more aggressive TLB batching
mm/madvise: deduplicate code in madvise_dontneed_free()
mm/madvise: process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
mm/internal.h | 5 +
mm/madvise.c | 396 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-26 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-26 16:12 Nadav Amit [this message]
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm/madvise: propagate vma->vm_end changes Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 9:08 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 10:11 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 11:55 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 12:33 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 12:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 12:59 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm/madvise: remove unnecessary check on madvise_dontneed_free() Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 9:11 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 11:05 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 12:19 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 12:52 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm/madvise: remove unnecessary checks on madvise_free_single_vma() Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 9:17 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 9:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm/madvise: define madvise behavior in a struct Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 9:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 10:31 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 12:14 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-09-27 20:36 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm/madvise: perform certain operations once on process_madvise() Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm/madvise: more aggressive TLB batching Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm/madvise: deduplicate code in madvise_dontneed_free() Nadav Amit
2021-09-26 16:12 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm/madvise: process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 9:24 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] mm/madvise: support process_madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 10:41 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 10:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 12:00 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-27 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-27 19:12 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-29 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-29 18:31 ` Nadav Amit
2021-10-12 23:14 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 15:47 ` Nadav Amit
2021-10-13 23:09 ` Peter Xu
2021-09-27 17:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-27 19:59 ` Nadav Amit
2021-09-28 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-28 22:56 ` Nadav Amit
2021-10-04 17:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-10-07 16:19 ` Nadav Amit
2021-10-07 16:46 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210926161259.238054-1-namit@vmware.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox