linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	guro@fb.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages reparented
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:38:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202109171456.jxu2POUm-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916134748.67712-8-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4323 bytes --]

Hi Muchun,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on tj-cgroup/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.15-rc1]
[cannot apply to hnaz-mm/master next-20210916]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Muchun-Song/Use-obj_cgroup-APIs-to-charge-the-LRU-pages/20210916-215452
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-next
config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210916 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/938e77565fc42d6c0d53b0470d75b4055200afe1
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Muchun-Song/Use-obj_cgroup-APIs-to-charge-the-LRU-pages/20210916-215452
        git checkout 938e77565fc42d6c0d53b0470d75b4055200afe1
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   mm/huge_memory.c:516:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
     516 | +static inline struct mem_cgroup *split_queue_memcg(struct deferred_split *queue)
         | ^
   In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:5,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:84,
                    from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/mmdebug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/mm.h:9,
                    from mm/huge_memory.c:8:
   mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'split_queue_lock':
   mm/huge_memory.c:543:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'split_queue_memcg'; did you mean 'split_queue_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     543 |  if (unlikely(split_queue_memcg(queue) != page_memcg(head))) {
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
         |                                          ^
>> mm/huge_memory.c:543:40: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
     543 |  if (unlikely(split_queue_memcg(queue) != page_memcg(head))) {
         |                                        ^~
   include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
         |                                          ^
   mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'split_queue_lock_irqsave':
   mm/huge_memory.c:567:40: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
     567 |  if (unlikely(split_queue_memcg(queue) != page_memcg(head))) {
         |                                        ^~
   include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
      78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
         |                                          ^
   mm/huge_memory.c: In function 'deferred_split_huge_page':
   mm/huge_memory.c:2839:8: warning: assignment to 'struct mem_cgroup *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    2839 |  memcg = split_queue_memcg(ds_queue);
         |        ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +543 mm/huge_memory.c

   533	
   534	static struct deferred_split *split_queue_lock(struct page *head)
   535	{
   536		struct deferred_split *queue;
   537	
   538		rcu_read_lock();
   539	retry:
   540		queue = page_split_queue(head);
   541		spin_lock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
   542	
 > 543		if (unlikely(split_queue_memcg(queue) != page_memcg(head))) {
   544			spin_unlock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
   545			goto retry;
   546		}
   547	
   548		/*
   549		 * Preemption is disabled in the internal of spin_lock, which can serve
   550		 * as RCU read-side critical sections.
   551		 */
   552		rcu_read_unlock();
   553	
   554		return queue;
   555	}
   556	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 35196 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 13:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] mm: move mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() to memcontrol.h Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2021-09-17 17:40   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] mm: memcontrol: introduce compact_lock_page_irqsave Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when the LRU pages reparented Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] mm: thp: introduce split_queue_lock/unlock{_irqsave}() Muchun Song
2021-09-17  2:43   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-17 17:07   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages reparented Muchun Song
2021-09-17  6:38   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of page_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2021-09-17 16:31   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] mm: memcontrol: rename {un}lock_page_memcg() to {un}lock_page_objcg() Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_PAGE to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2021-09-16 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
2021-09-17  1:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Roman Gushchin
2021-09-17 10:49   ` Muchun Song
2021-09-18  0:13     ` Roman Gushchin
2021-09-18  7:55       ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202109171456.jxu2POUm-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox