From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEF7C433F5 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEF2610A2 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:33:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 0EEF2610A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 68F42940008; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 01:33:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 63F5F940007; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 01:33:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 554D9940008; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 01:33:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0142.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40960940007 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 01:33:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5E130C9F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:33:17 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78588689634.02.F354B27 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8670A90000AD for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:33:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10107"; a="201725373" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,294,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="201725373" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2021 22:32:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,294,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="552927349" Received: from shbuild999.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.146.151]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2021 22:32:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:32:47 +0800 From: Feng Tang To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: detect allocation forbidden by cpuset and bail out early Message-ID: <20210915053247.GG56674@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> References: <1631590828-25565-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <3bd87d8a-d09e-ac7-1d1d-25ad1b9d5ed9@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3bd87d8a-d09e-ac7-1d1d-25ad1b9d5ed9@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8670A90000AD Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of feng.tang@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.136) smtp.mailfrom=feng.tang@intel.com X-Stat-Signature: ewzrtp6muau58i76n9e5kmej9owuqytr X-HE-Tag: 1631683996-702026 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:30:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2021, Feng Tang wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h > > index d2b9c41..d58e047 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h > > +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h > > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ > > */ > > extern struct static_key_false cpusets_pre_enable_key; > > extern struct static_key_false cpusets_enabled_key; > > +extern struct static_key_false cpusets_insane_config_key; > > + > > static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) > > { > > return static_branch_unlikely(&cpusets_enabled_key); > > @@ -51,6 +53,19 @@ static inline void cpuset_dec(void) > > static_branch_dec_cpuslocked(&cpusets_pre_enable_key); > > } > > > > +/* > > + * This will get enabled whenever a cpuset configuration is considered > > + * unsupportable in general. E.g. movable only node which cannot satisfy > > + * any non movable allocations (see update_nodemask). Page allocator > > + * needs to make additional checks for those configurations and this > > + * check is meant to guard those checks without any overhead for sane > > + * configurations. > > + */ > > +static inline bool cpusets_insane_config(void) > > +{ > > + return static_branch_unlikely(&cpusets_insane_config_key); > > +} > > + > > extern int cpuset_init(void); > > extern void cpuset_init_smp(void); > > extern void cpuset_force_rebuild(void); > > @@ -167,6 +182,8 @@ static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask) > > > > static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) { return false; } > > > > +static inline bool cpusets_insane_config(void) { return false; } > > + > > static inline int cpuset_init(void) { return 0; } > > static inline void cpuset_init_smp(void) {} > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h > > index 6a1d79d..a455333 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h > > @@ -1220,6 +1220,22 @@ static inline struct zoneref *first_zones_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist, > > #define for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zlist, highidx) \ > > for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zlist, highidx, NULL) > > > > +/* Whether the 'nodes' are all movable nodes */ > > +static inline bool movable_only_nodes(nodemask_t *nodes) > > +{ > > + struct zonelist *zonelist; > > + struct zoneref *z; > > + > > + if (nodes_empty(*nodes)) > > + return false; > > + > > + zonelist = > > + &NODE_DATA(first_node(*nodes))->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK]; > > + z = first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, ZONE_NORMAL, nodes); > > + return (!z->zone) ? true : false; > > +} > > + > > + > > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM > > #include > > #endif > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > > index df1ccf4..7fa633e 100644 > > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > > @@ -69,6 +69,13 @@ > > DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_pre_enable_key); > > DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_enabled_key); > > > > +/* > > + * There could be abnormal cpuset configurations for cpu or memory > > + * node binding, add this key to provide a quick low-cost judgement > > + * of the situation. > > + */ > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_insane_config_key); > > + > > /* See "Frequency meter" comments, below. */ > > > > struct fmeter { > > @@ -1868,6 +1875,14 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs, > > if (retval < 0) > > goto done; > > > > + if (!cpusets_insane_config() && > > + movable_only_nodes(&trialcs->mems_allowed)) { > > + static_branch_enable(&cpusets_insane_config_key); > > + pr_info("Unsupported (movable nodes only) cpuset configuration detected (nmask=%*pbl)! " > > + "Cpuset allocations might fail even with a lot of memory available.\n", > > + nodemask_pr_args(&trialcs->mems_allowed)); > > + } > > + > > spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock); > > cs->mems_allowed = trialcs->mems_allowed; > > spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock); > > Is this the only time that the state of the nodemask may change? > > I'm wondering about a single node nodemask, for example, where all > ZONE_NORMAL memory is hot-removed. Thanks for the reminding! Yes, memory hot remove can change the cpuset's effective nodemask, we may need to add similar check inside cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() which is called by cpuset_hotplug_workfn(), something like below? diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c index 7fa633e..d5f6776 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -3186,6 +3186,14 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp) cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(&new_cpus, cs->effective_cpus); mems_updated = !nodes_equal(new_mems, cs->effective_mems); + if (mems_updated && !cpusets_insane_config() && + movable_only_nodes(new_mems)) { + static_branch_enable(&cpusets_insane_config_key); + pr_info("Unsupported (movable nodes only) cpuset configuration detected (nmask=%*pbl) after memory hotplug." + "Cpuset allocations might fail even with a lot of memory available.\n", + nodemask_pr_args(new_mems); + } + if (is_in_v2_mode()) hotplug_update_tasks(cs, &new_cpus, &new_mems, cpus_updated, mems_updated); Thanks, Feng