From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2045C433FE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772761214 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:50:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5772761214 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C0A256B0071; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:50:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BB9E96B0072; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:50:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id ACF49900002; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:50:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0120.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.120]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC646B0071 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 23:50:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin32.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5298382499A8 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:50:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78588429570.32.569A2D9 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0428D6001984 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68A3761211; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:50:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1631677802; bh=ehBnRriQ/9bYDl2cldEheYmnNbHXE8FmT0zYlMMkxj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=npz36+ING3M584KM4OWfeBT3W5anGIE8wDXk0eEyia6Jrk1iusXcHvfRigsNoI9Bo YDzySz87GkViL2SWP6/pqDfaGYTKMumsdtTYyRDoe2/duDJR/zoGaFLk7E7ahLX+VJ 9QpXhSYa0xSrq0tQ2bbOs5jPTDJGTOyYsnsx836E= Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:50:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: yaozhenguo Cc: mike.kravetz@oracle.com, corbet@lwn.net, yaozhenguo@jd.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: Extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation Message-Id: <20210914205001.7ccc7ef3dd76a9ec551b370e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210909141655.87821-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> References: <20210909141655.87821-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=npz36+IN; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org; dmarc=none X-Stat-Signature: ka9hfzmmprojkkynqdr6ns78se8ejsb5 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0428D6001984 X-HE-Tag: 1631677804-440026 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 22:16:55 +0800 yaozhenguo wrote: > We can specify the number of hugepages to allocate at boot. But the > hugepages is balanced in all nodes at present. In some scenarios, > we only need hugepages in one node. For example: DPDK needs hugepages > which are in the same node as NIC. if DPDK needs four hugepages of 1G > size in node1 and system has 16 numa nodes. We must reserve 64 hugepages > in kernel cmdline. But, only four hugepages are used. The others should > be free after boot. If the system memory is low(for example: 64G), it will > be an impossible task. So, Extending hugepages parameter to support > specifying hugepages at a specific node. > For example add following parameter: > > hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:1,1:3 > > It will allocate 1 hugepage in node0 and 3 hugepages in node1. > > ... > > @@ -2842,10 +2843,75 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc(void) > } > } > > +static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(struct hstate *h, int nid) > +{ > + unsigned long i; > + char buf[32]; > + > + for (i = 0; i < h->max_huge_pages_node[nid]; ++i) { > + if (hstate_is_gigantic(h)) { > + struct huge_bootmem_page *m; > + void *addr; > + > + addr = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw( > + huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h), > + 0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid); > + if (!addr) > + break; > + m = addr; > + BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(virt_to_phys(m), huge_page_size(h))); We try very hard to avoid adding BUG calls. Is there any way in which this code can emit a WARNing then permit the kernel to keep operating? > + /* > + * Put them into a private list first because mem_map > + * is not up yet > + */ > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list); > + list_add(&m->list, &huge_boot_pages); > + m->hstate = h; > + } else { > + struct page *page; > + > + gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE; > + > + page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, > + &node_states[N_MEMORY], NULL); > + if (!page) > + break; > + put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */ > + } > + cond_resched(); > + } > + if (i == h->max_huge_pages_node[nid]) > + return; > + > + string_get_size(huge_page_size(h), 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, 32); > + pr_warn("HugeTLB: allocating %u of page size %s failed node%d. Only allocated %lu hugepages.\n", > + h->max_huge_pages_node[nid], buf, nid, i); > + h->max_huge_pages_node[nid] = i; > + h->max_huge_pages -= (h->max_huge_pages_node[nid] - i); > +} > +