From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: detect allocation forbidden by cpuset and bail out early
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 15:44:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910074400.GA18707@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YThg8Mp42b194k0/@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 09:06:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 08-09-21 09:50:14, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > While this is a good fix from the functionality POV I believe you can go
> > > a step further. Please add a detection to the cpuset code and complain
> > > to the kernel log if somebody tries to configure movable only cpuset.
> > > Once you have that in place you can easily create a static branch for
> > > cpuset_insane_setup() and have zero overhead for all reasonable
> > > configuration. There shouldn't be any reason to pay a single cpu cycle
> > > to check for something that almost nobody does.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > I thought about the implementation, IIUC, the static_branch_enable() is
> > easy, it could be done when cpuset.mems is set with movable only nodes,
> > but disable() is much complexer,
>
> Do we care about disable at all? The point is to not have 99,999999%
> users pay overhead of the check which is irrelevant to them. Once
> somebody wants to use this "creative" setup then paying an extra check
> sounds perfectly sensible to me. If somebody cares enough then the
> disable logic could be implemented. But for now I believe we should be
> OK with only enable case.
Here is tested draft patch to add the check in cpuset code (the looping
zone code could be improved by adding a for_each_populated_zone_nodemask
macro.
Thanks,
Feng
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 7 +++++++
include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 10 ++++++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +++-
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index d2b9c41..a434985 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
*/
extern struct static_key_false cpusets_pre_enable_key;
extern struct static_key_false cpusets_enabled_key;
+extern struct static_key_false cpusets_abnormal_setup_key;
+
static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&cpusets_enabled_key);
@@ -51,6 +53,11 @@ static inline void cpuset_dec(void)
static_branch_dec_cpuslocked(&cpusets_pre_enable_key);
}
+static inline bool cpusets_abnormal_check_needed(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&cpusets_abnormal_setup_key);
+}
+
extern int cpuset_init(void);
extern void cpuset_init_smp(void);
extern void cpuset_force_rebuild(void);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 6a1d79d..c3f5527 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1116,6 +1116,20 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone);
; /* do nothing */ \
else
+/* Whether the 'nodes' are all movable nodes */
+static inline bool movable_only_nodes(nodemask_t *nodes)
+{
+ struct zone *zone;
+
+ for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
+ if (zone_idx(zone) != ZONE_MOVABLE &&
+ node_isset(zone_to_nid(zone), *nodes))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static inline struct zone *zonelist_zone(struct zoneref *zoneref)
{
return zoneref->zone;
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index df1ccf4..e8a9053 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -69,6 +69,13 @@
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_pre_enable_key);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_enabled_key);
+/*
+ * There could be abnormal cpuset configurations for cpu or memory
+ * node binding, add this key to provide a quick low-cost judgement
+ * of the situation.
+ */
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpusets_abnormal_setup_key);
+
/* See "Frequency meter" comments, below. */
struct fmeter {
@@ -1868,6 +1875,9 @@ static int update_nodemask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (retval < 0)
goto done;
+ if (movable_only_nodes(&trialcs->mems_allowed))
+ static_branch_enable(&cpusets_abnormal_setup_key);
+
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cs->mems_allowed = trialcs->mems_allowed;
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 4e455fa..5728675 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4919,7 +4919,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
* any suitable zone to satisfy the request - e.g. non-movable
* GFP_HIGHUSER allocations from MOVABLE nodes only.
*/
- if (cpusets_enabled() && (gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL)) {
+ if (cpusets_enabled() &&
+ cpusets_abnormal_check_needed() &&
+ (gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL)) {
struct zoneref *z = first_zones_zonelist(ac->zonelist,
ac->highest_zoneidx,
&cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-07 8:25 Feng Tang
2021-09-07 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-08 1:50 ` Feng Tang
2021-09-08 7:06 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-08 8:12 ` Feng Tang
2021-09-10 7:44 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2021-09-10 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-10 9:21 ` Feng Tang
2021-09-10 10:35 ` Michal Hocko
2021-09-10 11:29 ` Feng Tang
2021-09-10 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910074400.GA18707@shbuild999.sh.intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox