From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mika.penttila@nextfour.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, songmuchun@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: free user PTE page table pages
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 14:55:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210901175547.GP1721383@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef7a722d-0bc0-1c68-b11b-9ede073516e0@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:49:23PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.09.21 19:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:19:03PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> > > > I wouldn't think it works everywhere, bit it works in a lot of places,
> > > > and it is a heck of a lot better than what is proposed here. I'd
> > > > rather see the places that can use it be moved, and the few places
> > > > that can't be opencoded.
> > >
> > > Well, I used ptep_get_map_lock() and friends. But hacking directly into
> > > ptep_map_lock() and friends wasn't possible due to all the corner cases.
> >
> > Sure, I'm not surprised you can't get every single case, but that just
> > suggest we need two API families, today's to support the special cases
> > and a different one for the other regular simple cases.
> >
> > A new function family pte_try_map/_locked() and paired unmap that can
> > internally do the recounting and THP trickery and convert the easy
> > callsites.
> >
> > Very rough counting suggest at least half of the pte_offset_map_lock()
> > call sites can trivially use the simpler API.
> >
> > The other cases can stay as is and get open coded refcounts, or maybe
> > someone will have a better idea once they are more clearly identified.
> >
> > But I don't think we should take a performance hit of additional
> > atomics in cases like GUP where this is trivially delt with by using a
> > better API.
>
> Right, but as I said in the cover letter, we can happily optimize once we
> have the basic infrastructure in place and properly reviewed. Getting rid of
> some unnecessary atomics by introducing additional fancy helpers falls under
> that category.
I'm not sure I agree given how big and wide this patch series is. It
would be easier to review if it was touching less places. The helpers
are not fancy, it is a logical re-arrangement of existing code that
shrinks the LOC of this series and makes it more reviewable.
Or stated another way, a niche feature like this try much harder not
to add more complexity everywhere.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-19 3:18 [PATCH v2 0/9] Free " Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: introduce pmd_install() helper Qi Zheng
2021-08-24 16:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-25 16:20 ` Qi Zheng
2021-08-25 16:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-26 3:04 ` Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: remove redundant smp_wmb() Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: rework the parameter of lock_page_or_retry() Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: move pte_alloc{,_map,_map_lock}() to a separate file Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: pte_refcount infrastructure Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: free user PTE page table pages Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 7:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-19 10:18 ` [External] " Qi Zheng
2021-09-01 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 15:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 16:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 16:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 16:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 17:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-09-01 17:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 18:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-02 7:04 ` Qi Zheng
2021-09-02 6:53 ` Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: add THP support for pte_ref Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: free PTE page table by using rcu mechanism Qi Zheng
2021-08-19 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: use mmu_gather to free PTE page table Qi Zheng
2021-09-01 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Free user PTE page table pages David Hildenbrand
2021-09-01 16:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-01 16:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-02 3:37 ` Qi Zheng
2021-09-15 14:52 ` Qi Zheng
2021-09-15 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-16 5:32 ` Qi Zheng
2021-09-16 8:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-16 8:41 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210901175547.GP1721383@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox