From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A2DC4338F for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC086126A for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:23:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 0CC086126A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 385656B0078; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:23:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 270FD6B007B; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:23:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id ECCE46B0075; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:23:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0021.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.21]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A1F8D0003 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin22.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4CD1801EE9B for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:23:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78496281024.22.56CDFD9 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8685F00008E for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 18:23:11 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10082"; a="277838805" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,338,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="277838805" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 11:23:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,338,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="523799170" Received: from yyu32-desk.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.146]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2021 11:23:08 -0700 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang , Rick P Edgecombe Cc: Yu-cheng Yu Subject: [PATCH v29 06/10] x86/cet/ibt: Update arch_prctl functions for Indirect Branch Tracking Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:22:41 -0700 Message-Id: <20210820182245.1188-7-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20210820182245.1188-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20210820182245.1188-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of yu-cheng.yu@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.31) smtp.mailfrom=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A8685F00008E X-Stat-Signature: ztyo73wxkctisqszgw84fq33tf37c78k X-HE-Tag: 1629483791-664218 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: "H.J. Lu" Update ARCH_X86_CET_STATUS and ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE for Indirect Branch Tracking. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook --- arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c index b426d200e070..bd3c80d402e7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ static int cet_copy_status_to_user(struct thread_shstk = *shstk, u64 __user *ubuf) buf[2] =3D shstk->size; } =20 + if (shstk->ibt) + buf[0] |=3D GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_IBT; + return copy_to_user(ubuf, buf, sizeof(buf)); } =20 @@ -46,6 +49,8 @@ int prctl_cet(int option, u64 arg2) return -EINVAL; if (arg2 & GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_SHSTK) shstk_disable(); + if (arg2 & GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_IBT) + ibt_disable(); return 0; =20 case ARCH_X86_CET_LOCK: --=20 2.21.0