From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26827C4338F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD00861052 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CD00861052 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 688536B0071; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:53:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6372C6B0072; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:53:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 525936B0073; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:53:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0065.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.65]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5E76B0071 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:53:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B39250A5 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:27 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78485622054.05.223DC54 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4292B0000B1 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 820736023D; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:53:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1629230006; bh=9GEGh06hgVZ4wI/Kk+52EPsOEBhM9iF9HKLdjFqgxfg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CS//o0DK+yKr6+6YKszPb0vm5D7X9Hj5mNaX71mkAZyA1XVhoVXklXMQZPvHuKMJ9 pWxenJ0tAOxyq0/kkJjLkYoUsZytFWCBHRgb3feDF8Q6y1fxZ5j0QQ6qU5JzLqT6AB PWCLHKPFisgeK7tvPjP318XW6sJUlLre4zYmTchw= Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:53:25 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jann Horn Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 35/35] mm, slub: convert kmem_cpu_slab protection to local_lock Message-Id: <20210817125325.d0ed45d664596d1e80a591d7@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20210805152000.12817-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20210805152000.12817-36-vbabka@suse.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A4292B0000B1 X-Stat-Signature: 5rwx6bsxkispa1w49kwz1ouirnwgxke9 Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b="CS//o0DK"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of akpm@linux-foundation.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=akpm@linux-foundation.org X-HE-Tag: 1629230007-906837 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:14:58 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Another fixup. Is it too many and should we replace it all with a v5? Maybe do a full resend when things have settled down and I can at least check that we match. What's your confidence level for a 5.15-rc1 merge? It isn't terribly well reviewed?