From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/gup: small refactoring: simplify try_grab_page()
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 21:41:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210813044133.1536842-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210813044133.1536842-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
try_grab_page() does the same thing as try_grab_compound_head(...,
refs=1, ...), just with a different API. So there is a lot of code
duplication there.
Change try_grab_page() to call try_grab_compound_head(), while keeping
the API contract identical for callers.
Also, now that try_grab_compound_head() always has a caller, remove the
__maybe_unused annotation.
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++--
mm/gup.c | 35 +++++------------------------------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index ce8fc0fd6d6e..ba985eaf3f19 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1204,8 +1204,8 @@ static inline void get_page(struct page *page)
}
bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags);
-__maybe_unused struct page *try_grab_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs,
- unsigned int flags);
+struct page *try_grab_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs,
+ unsigned int flags);
static inline __must_check bool try_get_page(struct page *page)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 52f08e3177e9..886d6148d3d0 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static inline struct page *try_get_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs)
* considered failure, and furthermore, a likely bug in the caller, so a warning
* is also emitted.
*/
-__maybe_unused struct page *try_grab_compound_head(struct page *page,
- int refs, unsigned int flags)
+struct page *try_grab_compound_head(struct page *page,
+ int refs, unsigned int flags)
{
if (flags & FOLL_GET)
return try_get_compound_head(page, refs);
@@ -208,35 +208,10 @@ static void put_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs, unsigned int flags)
*/
bool __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN)) == (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN));
+ if (!(flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN)))
+ return true;
- if (flags & FOLL_GET)
- return try_get_page(page);
- else if (flags & FOLL_PIN) {
- int refs = 1;
-
- page = compound_head(page);
-
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_ref_count(page) <= 0))
- return false;
-
- if (hpage_pincount_available(page))
- hpage_pincount_add(page, 1);
- else
- refs = GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS;
-
- /*
- * Similar to try_grab_compound_head(): even if using the
- * hpage_pincount_add/_sub() routines, be sure to
- * *also* increment the normal page refcount field at least
- * once, so that the page really is pinned.
- */
- page_ref_add(page, refs);
-
- mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, 1);
- }
-
- return true;
+ return try_grab_compound_head(page, 1, flags);
}
/**
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 4:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] A few gup refactorings and documentation updates John Hubbard
2021-08-13 4:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/gup: documentation corrections for gup/pup John Hubbard
2021-08-13 4:41 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2021-08-13 4:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/gup: Remove try_get_page(), call try_get_compound_head() directly John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210813044133.1536842-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox