From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BCBC07E9B for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B771161009 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:41:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B771161009 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 947C26B0073; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 02:41:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8F6FF6B0075; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 02:41:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7A5706B0073; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 02:41:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0190.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.190]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588446B0073 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 02:41:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67848248047 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:41:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78385648152.11.D128942 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B724F009AC0 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 06:41:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10051"; a="272496395" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,257,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="272496395" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jul 2021 23:39:57 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,257,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="511390036" Received: from yhuang6-desk2.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.119]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jul 2021 23:39:53 -0700 From: Huang Ying To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch , Dave Hansen , "Huang, Ying" , Yang Shi , Michal Hocko , Zi Yan , Wei Xu , David Rientjes , Dan Williams , David Hildenbrand , Greg Thelen , Oscar Salvador , Yang Shi Subject: [PATCH -V11 7/9] mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:39:24 +0800 Message-Id: <20210721063926.3024591-7-ying.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210721063926.3024591-1-ying.huang@intel.com> References: <20210721063926.3024591-1-ying.huang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of ying.huang@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.31) smtp.mailfrom=ying.huang@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4B724F009AC0 X-Stat-Signature: cy7y6sww96hy676qzgif5chg8ha8itj6 X-HE-Tag: 1626849676-468966 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Keith Busch Reclaim anonymous pages if a migration path is available now that demotio= n provides a non-swap recourse for reclaiming anon pages. Note that this check is subtly different from the can_age_anon_pages() checks. This mechanism checks whether a specific page in a specific context can actually be reclaimed, given current swap space and cgroup limits. can_age_anon_pages() is a much simpler and more preliminary check which just says whether there is a possibility of future reclaim. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210715055145.195411-8-ying.huang@intel.= com Cc: Keith Busch Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" Reviewed-by: Yang Shi Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Zi Yan Cc: Wei Xu Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Dan Williams Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Greg Thelen Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Yang Shi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmscan.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index d79bf91700de..67a320c6571d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static long add_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker = *shrinker, =20 static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc) { - if (sc->no_demotion) + if (sc && sc->no_demotion) return false; if (next_demotion_node(nid) =3D=3D NUMA_NO_NODE) return false; @@ -530,6 +530,31 @@ static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control = *sc) return false; } =20 +static inline bool can_reclaim_anon_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + int nid, + struct scan_control *sc) +{ + if (memcg =3D=3D NULL) { + /* + * For non-memcg reclaim, is there + * space in any swap device? + */ + if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + return true; + } else { + /* Is the memcg below its swap limit? */ + if (mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) > 0) + return true; + } + + /* + * The page can not be swapped. + * + * Can it be reclaimed from this node via demotion? + */ + return can_demote(nid, sc); +} + /* * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counte= rs. * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is @@ -541,7 +566,7 @@ unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zon= e) =20 nr =3D zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE) + zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE); - if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + if (can_reclaim_anon_pages(NULL, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL)) nr +=3D zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON) + zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON); =20 @@ -2544,6 +2569,7 @@ enum scan_balance { static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *s= c, unsigned long *nr) { + struct pglist_data *pgdat =3D lruvec_pgdat(lruvec); struct mem_cgroup *memcg =3D lruvec_memcg(lruvec); unsigned long anon_cost, file_cost, total_cost; int swappiness =3D mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg); @@ -2554,7 +2580,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, s= truct scan_control *sc, enum lru_list lru; =20 /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */ - if (!sc->may_swap || mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) <=3D 0) { + if (!sc->may_swap || !can_reclaim_anon_pages(memcg, pgdat->node_id, sc)= ) { scan_balance =3D SCAN_FILE; goto out; } @@ -2924,7 +2950,7 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct p= glist_data *pgdat, */ pages_for_compaction =3D compact_gap(sc->order); inactive_lru_pages =3D node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + if (can_reclaim_anon_pages(NULL, pgdat->node_id, sc)) inactive_lru_pages +=3D node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); =20 return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction; --=20 2.30.2