From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg+linux@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] writeback: Fix bandwidth estimates
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:27:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712162733.GB9804@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH9Oa-ba0Y4BxzM6=7fDN09zmetd3EUSfSPNu3EcFbdGV+KDvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri 09-07-21 15:19:17, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Thanks for sending this patch series!
>
> I have used the mmap.c reproducer as before, with the following parameters:
> * mkdir /tmp/mnt
> * fusermount -u /tmp/mnt; /root/fuse-2.9.9/example/fusexmp_fh -f /tmp/mnt
> * dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/was bs=1M count=99
> * while :; do grep ^Bdi /sys/kernel/debug/bdi/0:44/stats; sleep 0.1; done
> * while :; do time WORKAROUND=1 ~/mmap /tmp/was
> /tmp/mnt/tmp/stapelberg.1; sleep 5; done
>
> Previously, after a few iterations, the BdiWriteBandwidth measure
> would gradually approach 0.
>
> With your patch series applied, the BdiWriteBandwidth is updated much
> more quickly, and converges to ≈16000 kBps.
> When I start copying more quickly, the bandwidth measure rises quickly.
>
> As far as I understand, this should fix the problem (provided 16000
> kBps is an okay value).
> Certainly, I don’t see the downward spiral either with your patches :)
Thanks for testing! Can I add your Tested-by tag?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-05 16:23 Jan Kara
2021-07-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: Track number of inodes under writeback Jan Kara
2021-07-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: Reliably update bandwidth estimation Jan Kara
2021-07-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: Fix bandwidth estimate for spiky workload Jan Kara
2021-07-07 7:40 ` Hillf Danton
2021-07-07 9:51 ` Jan Kara
2021-07-08 12:17 ` Hillf Danton
2021-07-08 16:43 ` Jan Kara
2021-07-09 8:01 ` Hillf Danton
2021-07-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: Rename domain_update_bandwidth() Jan Kara
2021-07-05 16:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: Use READ_ONCE for unlocked reads of writeback stats Jan Kara
2021-07-09 13:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] writeback: Fix bandwidth estimates Michael Stapelberg
2021-07-12 16:27 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-07-13 8:15 ` Michael Stapelberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210712162733.GB9804@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stapelberg+linux@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox