From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FC9C48BD1 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03527613FF for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 03527613FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 407746B006C; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:33:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3B7646B0071; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:33:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 258DF6B0072; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:33:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0180.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938FD6B006C for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EFE181AEF32 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:32:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78238960926.08.EBE1237 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD6A00026D for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 391D761287; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 16:31:58 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Shuah Khan , Laurent Pinchart , Konstantin Ryabitsev , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , David Hildenbrand , James Bottomley , Greg KH , Christoph Lameter , Theodore Ts'o , Jiri Kosina , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Maintainers / Kernel Summit 2021 planning kick-off Message-ID: <20210610163158.017a9721@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <5038827c-463f-232d-4dec-da56c71089bd@metux.net> <20210610182318.jrxe3avfhkqq7xqn@nitro.local> <20210610152633.7e4a7304@oasis.local.home> <37e8d1a5-7c32-8e77-bb05-f851c87a1004@linuxfoundation.org> <20210610160246.13722775@oasis.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45CD6A00026D Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of "SRS0=mBZH=LE=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org" designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=mBZH=LE=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org" X-Stat-Signature: nujjqax48xsrd4ufyh5pf6wjzbtgmcc6 X-HE-Tag: 1623357118-878485 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:20:50 +0100 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Perhaps we could actually _enhance_ conferences by forbidding > direct audience questions and having a moderator select questions / > "more of a comment actually" from an official live chat platform to > engage the speaker directly on stage. It would segue naturally into > "the speaker is now done with their presentation and here's some good > followup discussion". So many times people have come up to me after > a presentation and asked a question that I really wish I could have > answered for everybody there. For presentations, I think this is a very good idea. But it wouldn't work for a BoF or a microconference. I also thought about doing this for a presentations. That is, "Please submit all questions online, and the presenter will answer them". Of course, if you have someone that didn't bring their laptop or phone (there are people that do that too). They should have a way to submit a question as well. Perhaps instead of going in line to a microphone, go in line to a public laptop to type in your question. -- Steve