From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] writeback, cgroup: keep list of inodes attached to bdi_writeback
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:55:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210603085533.GE23647@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210603005517.1403689-3-guro@fb.com>
On Wed 02-06-21 17:55:14, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Currently there is no way to iterate over inodes attached to a
> specific cgwb structure. It limits the ability to efficiently
> reclaim the writeback structure itself and associated memory and
> block cgroup structures without scanning all inodes belonging to a sb,
> which can be prohibitively expensive.
>
> While dirty/in-active-writeback an inode belongs to one of the
> bdi_writeback's io lists: b_dirty, b_io, b_more_io and b_dirty_time.
> Once cleaned up, it's removed from all io lists. So the
> inode->i_io_list can be reused to maintain the list of inodes,
> attached to a bdi_writeback structure.
>
> This patch introduces a new wb->b_attached list, which contains all
> inodes which were dirty at least once and are attached to the given
> cgwb. Inodes attached to the root bdi_writeback structures are never
> placed on such list. The following patch will use this list to try to
> release cgwbs structures more efficiently.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Looks good, just one small comment below, with that fixed feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
...
> @@ -1014,6 +1024,12 @@ fs_initcall(cgroup_writeback_init);
> static void bdi_down_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { }
> static void bdi_up_write_wb_switch_rwsem(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { }
>
> +static void inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(struct inode *inode,
> + struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> +{
> + list_del_init(&inode->i_io_list);
> +}
> +
I think you miss clearing of I_SYNC_QUEUED here. Also you could add here
the lock assertions that are in the other version of
inode_cgwb_move_to_attached().
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 0:55 [PATCH v6 0/5] cgroup, blkcg: prevent dirty inodes to pin dying memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] writeback, cgroup: switch to rcu_work API in inode_switch_wbs() Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 8:46 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] writeback, cgroup: keep list of inodes attached to bdi_writeback Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 8:55 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2021-06-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] writeback, cgroup: split out the functional part of inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 8:57 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] writeback, cgroup: support switching multiple inodes at once Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 10:10 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-03 0:55 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] writeback, cgroup: release dying cgwbs by switching attached inodes Roman Gushchin
2021-06-03 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2021-06-04 1:36 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210603085533.GE23647@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox