From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>, <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
<rcampbell@nvidia.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<hch@infradead.org>, <jglisse@redhat.com>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>, <hughd@google.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte()
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:27:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210524132725.12697-7-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210524132725.12697-1-apopple@nvidia.com>
Currently if copy_nonpresent_pte() returns a non-zero value it is
assumed to be a swap entry which requires further processing outside the
loop in copy_pte_range() after dropping locks. This prevents other
values being returned to signal conditions such as failure which a
subsequent change requires.
Instead make copy_nonpresent_pte() return an error code if further
processing is required and read the value for the swap entry in the main
loop under the ptl.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
v9:
New for v9 to allow device exclusive handling to occur in
copy_nonpresent_pte().
---
mm/memory.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 2fb455c365c2..e061cfa18c11 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) {
if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0)
- return entry.val;
+ return -EAGAIN;
/* make sure dst_mm is on swapoff's mmlist. */
if (unlikely(list_empty(&dst_mm->mmlist))) {
@@ -974,11 +974,13 @@ copy_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
continue;
}
if (unlikely(!pte_present(*src_pte))) {
- entry.val = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
- dst_pte, src_pte,
- src_vma, addr, rss);
- if (entry.val)
+ ret = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
+ dst_pte, src_pte,
+ src_vma, addr, rss);
+ if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
+ entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*src_pte);
break;
+ }
progress += 8;
continue;
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 13:27 [PATCH v9 00/10] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-05-25 18:39 ` Liam Howlett
2021-05-25 23:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-06-04 20:49 ` Liam Howlett
2021-06-05 0:41 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-06-05 3:39 ` Liam Howlett
2021-06-05 4:19 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-06-07 4:51 ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] mm: Rename migrate_pgmap_owner Alistair Popple
2021-05-26 19:41 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-24 13:27 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2021-05-26 19:50 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte() Peter Xu
2021-05-27 1:20 ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-27 1:44 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-25 1:31 ` John Hubbard
2021-05-25 9:21 ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-25 11:51 ` Balbir Singh
2021-05-26 7:17 ` John Hubbard
2021-05-26 13:30 ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-02 8:50 ` Balbir Singh
2021-06-02 14:37 ` Peter Xu
2021-06-03 11:39 ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-03 14:47 ` Peter Xu
2021-06-04 1:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-04 15:20 ` Peter Xu
2021-06-03 8:37 ` John Hubbard
2021-05-26 19:28 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-27 3:35 ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-27 13:04 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-28 1:48 ` Alistair Popple
2021-05-28 13:11 ` Peter Xu
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-05-24 13:27 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210524132725.12697-7-apopple@nvidia.com \
--to=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox