From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 27/28] dyndbg: unionize _ddebug*_headers with struct _ddebug*
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:50:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511185057.3815777-28-jim.cromie@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511185057.3815777-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Up until now, to create our header record (pair), we reused struct
_ddebug(|_sites), initializing the pair with "impossible" field values
(for a pr_debug() site), which makes it recognizable as a header not a
pr-debug callsite.
Now we want to specialize the header; differentiate it from its model,
then we can drop _ddebug.site, and use header.site indirectly.
This commit has several elements combining:
Update DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_TABLE by replacing "struct _ddebug*" with
"union _ddebug*_header". This change places the new object types into
our 2 elf sections.
our 2 new union types have 2 jobs:
a.fit properly in the section/array. We do this by putting the struct
inside the union, making the unions the same size as their contained
structs. This was sufficient to fix a data-misalignment crash on
2nd loop (ie 1st record after header) in _init.
b.unions need the same field defns as their models, as refd in:
DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_TABLE() - inits
is_dyndbg_header_pair(i,s) - validates that init
use anonymous struct.
RFC: My "anonymous union/struct fu" feels incomplete. The struct in b
must contain all the fields of its outer union's own contained struct,
maybe even in the same order (tho not obvious yet).
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
index 46901b5348ee..9ca413985fb2 100644
--- a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
+++ b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
@@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ struct _ddebug_site {
const char *function;
} __aligned(8);
+/* verbatim copy of struct _ddebug_site. nothing to save here. */
+union _ddebug_site_header {
+ struct _ddebug_site __; /* inherit footprint */
+ struct { /* header validation */
+ const char *modname;
+ const char *filename;
+ const char *function;
+ };
+};
+
struct _ddebug {
SITE_CHK_(struct _ddebug_site *site;)
/* format is always needed, lineno shares word with flags */
@@ -74,6 +84,21 @@ struct _ddebug {
#endif
} __aligned(8);
+/*
+ * specialized version of struct _ddebug. The only field we NEED is
+ * .site, since keeping it here allows dropping from struct _ddebug
+ * itself. format, lineno are used to validate header records.
+ */
+union _ddebug_header {
+ struct _ddebug __; /* inherit footprint */
+ struct { /* header validation */
+ union _ddebug_site_header *site;
+ const char *format;
+ const unsigned lineno:18;
+ unsigned _index:14;
+ unsigned int flags:8;
+ };
+};
#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_CORE)
@@ -136,10 +161,10 @@ void __dynamic_ibdev_dbg(struct _ddebug *descriptor,
*/
#define DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_TABLE() \
/* forward decl, allowing loopback pointer */ \
- __weak struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) \
+ __weak union _ddebug_header __used __aligned(8) \
__section(".gnu.linkonce.dyndbg") \
_LINKONCE_dyndbg_header; \
- __weak struct _ddebug_site __used __aligned(8) \
+ __weak union _ddebug_site_header __used __aligned(8) \
__section(".gnu.linkonce.dyndbg_site") \
_LINKONCE_dyndbg_site_header = { \
.modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
@@ -147,7 +172,7 @@ void __dynamic_ibdev_dbg(struct _ddebug *descriptor,
/* forced pointer loopback, for distinction */ \
.filename = (void *) &_LINKONCE_dyndbg_header \
}; \
- __weak struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) \
+ __weak union _ddebug_header __used __aligned(8) \
__section(".gnu.linkonce.dyndbg") \
_LINKONCE_dyndbg_header = { \
SITE_INIT_(_LINKONCE_dyndbg_site_header) \
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 18:50 [RFC PATCH v5 00/28] dynamic debug diet plan Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/28] dyndbg: avoid calling dyndbg_emit_prefix when it has no work Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/28] dyndbg: drop uninformative vpr_info Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/28] dyndbg: split struct _ddebug's display fields to new _ddebug_site Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/28] dyndbg: __init iterate over __dyndbg & __dyndbg_site in parallel Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/28] dyndbg: refactor part of ddebug_change to ddebug_match_site Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/28] dyndbg: accept null site in ddebug_match_site Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/28] dyndbg: hoist ->site out of ddebug_match_site Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/28] dyndbg: accept null site in ddebug_change Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/28] dyndbg: accept null site in dynamic_emit_prefix Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/28] dyndbg: accept null site in ddebug_proc_show Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/28] dyndbg: refactor ddebug_alter_site out of ddebug_change Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/28] dyndbg: allow deleting site info via control interface Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/28] dyndbg+module: expose ddebug_sites to modules Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/28] dyndbg: add ddebug_site(_get|_put) abstraction Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/28] dyndbg: ddebug_add_module avoid adding empty modules Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/28] dyndbg: add _index to struct _ddebug Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/28] dyndbg: prevent build bugs via -DNO_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_TABLE Jim Cromie
2021-05-12 14:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 18:03 ` jim.cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/28] dyndbg: RFC - DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_TABLE Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/28] dyndbg: RFC handle __dyndbg* sections in module.lds.h Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/28] dyndbg: ddebug_add_module() handle headers Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/28] dyndbg: validate ddebug_site_get invariants Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/28] dyndbg: fix NULL deref after deleting sites Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/28] dyndbg: dont show header records in control Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/28] dyndbg: make site pointer and checks on it optional (not quite) Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/28] dyndbg: swap WARN_ON for BUG_ON see what 0-day says Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/28] dyndbg: fixup protect header when deleting site Jim Cromie
2021-05-11 18:50 ` Jim Cromie [this message]
2021-05-11 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/28] dyndbg: RFC drop _ddebug.site pointer Jim Cromie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511185057.3815777-28-jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox