From: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"osalvador@suse.de" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: fix race with compound page allocation
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:46:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210428074654.GA2093897@u2004> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423080153.GA78658@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 08:01:54AM +0000, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 08:27:46AM +0000, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > > On 4/21/21 1:33 AM, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > >> [Cc Naoya]
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed 21-04-21 14:02:59, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > >>> The possible bad scenario:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> CPU0: CPU1:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> gather_surplus_pages()
> > > >>> page = alloc_surplus_huge_page()
> > > >>> memory_failure_hugetlb()
> > > >>> get_hwpoison_page(page)
> > > >>> __get_hwpoison_page(page)
> > > >>> get_page_unless_zero(page)
> > > >>> zero = put_page_testzero(page)
> > > >>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zero, page)
> > > >>> enqueue_huge_page(h, page)
> > > >>> put_page(page)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The refcount can possibly be increased by memory-failure or soft_offline
> > > >>> handlers, we can trigger VM_BUG_ON_PAGE and wrongly add the page to the
> > > >>> hugetlb pool list.
> > > >>
> > > >> The hwpoison side of this looks really suspicious to me. It shouldn't
> > > >> really touch the reference count of hugetlb pages without being very
> > > >> careful (and having hugetlb_lock held).
> > > >
> > > > I have the same feeling, there is a window where a hugepage is refcounted
> > > > during converting from buddy free pages into free hugepage, so refcount
> > > > alone is not enough to prevent the race. hugetlb_lock is retaken after
> > > > alloc_surplus_huge_page returns, so simply holding hugetlb_lock in
> > > > get_hwpoison_page() seems not work. Is there any status bit to show that a
> > > > hugepage is just being initialized (not in free hugepage pool or in use)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It seems we can also race with the code that makes a compound page a
> > > hugetlb page. The memory failure code could be called after allocating
> > > pages from buddy and before setting compound page DTOR. So, the memory
> > > handling code will process it as a compound page.
> >
> > Yes, so get_hwpoison_page() has to call get_page_unless_zero()
> > only when memory_failure() can surely handle the error.
> >
> > >
> > > Just thinking that this may not be limited to the hugetlb specific memory
> > > failure handling?
> >
> > Currently hugetlb page is the only type of compound page supported by memory
> > failure. But I agree with you that other types of compound pages have the
> > same race window, and judging only with get_page_unless_zero() is dangerous.
> > So I think that __get_hwpoison_page() should have the following structure:
> >
> > if (PageCompound) {
> > if (PageHuge) {
> > if (PageHugeFreed || PageHugeActive) {
> > if (get_page_unless_zero)
> > return 0; // path for in-use hugetlb page
> > else
> > return 1; // path for free hugetlb page
> > } else {
> > return -EBUSY; // any transient hugetlb page
> > }
> > } else {
> > ... // any other compound page (like thp, slab, ...)
> > }
> > } else {
> > ... // any non-compound page
> > }
>
> The above pseudo code was wrong, so let me update my thought.
> I'm now trying to solve the reported issue by changing __get_hwpoison_page()
> like below:
>
> static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
> {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
>
> if (PageCompound(page)) {
> if (PageSlab(page)) {
> return get_page_unless_zero(page);
> } else if (PageHuge(head)) {
> if (HPageFreed(head) || HPageMigratable(head))
> return get_page_unless_zero(head);
> } else if (PageTransHuge(head)) {
> /*
> * Non anonymous thp exists only in allocation/free time. We
> * can't handle such a case correctly, so let's give it up.
> * This should be better than triggering BUG_ON when kernel
> * tries to touch the "partially handled" page.
> */
> if (!PageAnon(head)) {
> pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: non anonymous thp\n",
> page_to_pfn(page));
> return 0;
> }
> if (get_page_unless_zero(head)) {
> if (head == compound_head(page))
> return 1;
> pr_info("Memory failure: %#lx cannot catch tail\n",
> page_to_pfn(page));
> put_page(head);
> }
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> return get_page_unless_zero(page);
> }
>
> Some notes:
>
> - in hugetlb path, new HPage* checks should avoid the reported race,
> but I still need more testing to confirm it,
> - PageSlab check is added because otherwise I found that "non anonymous thp"
> path is chosen, that's obviously wrong,
> - thp's branch has a known issue unrelated to the current issue, which
> will/should be improved later.
>
> I'll send a patch next week.
I confirmed that the patch fixes the reported problem (in the testcase
triggering VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() without this patch).
So let me suggest this as a fix on hwpoison side.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
---
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:55:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: fix race with compound page allocation
When hugetlb page fault (under overcommiting situation) and memory_failure()
race, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() is triggered by the following race:
CPU0: CPU1:
gather_surplus_pages()
page = alloc_surplus_huge_page()
memory_failure_hugetlb()
get_hwpoison_page(page)
__get_hwpoison_page(page)
get_page_unless_zero(page)
zero = put_page_testzero(page)
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zero, page)
enqueue_huge_page(h, page)
put_page(page)
__get_hwpoison_page() only checks page refcount before taking additional
one for memory error handling, which is wrong because there's time
windows where compound pages have non-zero refcount during initialization.
So makes __get_hwpoison_page() check more page status for a few types
of compound pages. PageSlab() check is added because otherwise
"non anonymous thp" path is wrongly chosen for slab pages.
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a3659619d293..61988e332712 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1095,30 +1095,36 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page)
{
struct page *head = compound_head(page);
- if (!PageHuge(head) && PageTransHuge(head)) {
- /*
- * Non anonymous thp exists only in allocation/free time. We
- * can't handle such a case correctly, so let's give it up.
- * This should be better than triggering BUG_ON when kernel
- * tries to touch the "partially handled" page.
- */
- if (!PageAnon(head)) {
- pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: non anonymous thp\n",
- page_to_pfn(page));
- return 0;
+ if (PageCompound(page)) {
+ if (PageSlab(page)) {
+ return get_page_unless_zero(page);
+ } else if (PageHuge(head)) {
+ if (HPageFreed(head) || HPageMigratable(head))
+ return get_page_unless_zero(head);
+ } else if (PageTransHuge(head)) {
+ /*
+ * Non anonymous thp exists only in allocation/free time. We
+ * can't handle such a case correctly, so let's give it up.
+ * This should be better than triggering BUG_ON when kernel
+ * tries to touch the "partially handled" page.
+ */
+ if (!PageAnon(head)) {
+ pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: non anonymous thp\n",
+ page_to_pfn(page));
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (get_page_unless_zero(head)) {
+ if (head == compound_head(page))
+ return 1;
+ pr_info("Memory failure: %#lx cannot catch tail\n",
+ page_to_pfn(page));
+ put_page(head);
+ }
}
+ return 0;
}
- if (get_page_unless_zero(head)) {
- if (head == compound_head(page))
- return 1;
-
- pr_info("Memory failure: %#lx cannot catch tail\n",
- page_to_pfn(page));
- put_page(head);
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return get_page_unless_zero(page);
}
/*
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 6:02 [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between memory-failure/soft_offline and gather_surplus_pages Muchun Song
2021-04-21 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-21 8:15 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-04-21 8:21 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-21 8:41 ` Muchun Song
2021-04-21 8:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-21 8:58 ` Muchun Song
2021-04-21 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-21 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-21 8:33 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-04-21 9:02 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-04-21 18:03 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-22 8:27 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-04-23 8:01 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-04-28 7:46 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2021-04-28 8:23 ` [PATCH] mm,hwpoison: fix race with compound page allocation Oscar Salvador
2021-04-28 9:18 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-05-06 1:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Naoya Horiguchi
2021-05-06 8:51 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-05-07 4:17 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210428074654.GA2093897@u2004 \
--to=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox