From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/24] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:12:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210427161317.50682-3-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210427161317.50682-1-peterx@redhat.com>
pte_unmap_same() will always unmap the pte pointer. After the unmap, vmf->pte
will not be valid any more. We should clear it.
It was safe only because no one is accessing vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same()
returns, since the only caller of pte_unmap_same() (so far) is do_swap_page(),
where vmf->pte will in most cases be overwritten very soon.
pte_unmap_same() will be used in other places in follow up patches, so that
vmf->pte will not always be re-written. This patch enables us to call
functions like finish_fault() because that'll conditionally unmap the pte by
checking vmf->pte first. Or, alloc_set_pte() will make sure to allocate a new
pte even after calling pte_unmap_same().
Since we'll need to modify vmf->pte, directly pass in vmf into pte_unmap_same()
and then we can also avoid the long parameter list.
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index ffda19542bc6d..955a0bb6b855c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2618,19 +2618,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_existing_page_range);
* proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check;
* and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on).
*/
-static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
- pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte)
+static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
{
int same = 1;
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
- spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+ spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
spin_lock(ptl);
- same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte);
+ same = pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte);
spin_unlock(ptl);
}
#endif
- pte_unmap(page_table);
+ pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+ /* After unmap of pte, the pointer is invalid now - clear it. */
+ vmf->pte = NULL;
return same;
}
@@ -3319,7 +3320,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
vm_fault_t ret = 0;
void *shadow = NULL;
- if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+ if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
goto out;
entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 16:12 [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 18:54 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] mm/hugetlb: Drop __unmap_hugepage_range definition from hugetlb.h Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2021-04-28 0:07 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-27 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-05-14 7:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-05-14 13:18 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210427161317.50682-3-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox