From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (in)consistency of page/folio function naming
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422134114.GN3596236@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422122117.GE2047089@ziepe.ca>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:21:17AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:09:45AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 22.04.21 05:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm going through my patch queue implementing peterz's request to rename
> > > FolioUptodate() as folio_uptodate(). It's going pretty well, but it
> > > throws into relief all the places where we're not consistent naming
> > > existing functions which operate on pages as page_foo(). The folio
> > > conversion is a great opportunity to sort that out. Mostly so far, I've
> > > just done s/page/folio/ on function names, but there's the opportunity to
> > > regularise a lot of them, eg:
> > >
> > > put_page folio_put
> > > lock_page folio_lock
> > > lock_page_or_retry folio_lock_or_retry
> > > rotate_reclaimable_page folio_rotate_reclaimable
> > > end_page_writeback folio_end_writeback
> > > clear_page_dirty_for_io folio_clear_dirty_for_io
> > >
> > > Some of these make a lot of sense -- eg when ClearPageDirty has turned
> > > into folio_clear_dirty(), having folio_clear_dirty_for_io() looks regular.
> > > I'm not entirely convinced about folio_lock(), but folio_lock_or_retry()
> > > makes more sense than lock_page_or_retry(). Ditto _killable() or
> > > _async().
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > I tend to like prefixes: they directly set the topic.
> >
> > The only thing I'm concerned is that we end up with
> >
> > put_page vs. folio_put
> >
> > which is suboptimal.
>
> We have this issue across the kernel already, eg kref_put() vs its
> wrapper put_device()
>
> Personally I tend to think the regularity of 'thing'_'action' is
> easier to remember than to try to guess/remember that someone judged
> 'action'_'thing' to be more englishy.
Mostly agree. object_verb_attribute is usually better, but i'm not
changing offset_in_folio() to folio_calculate_offset() (unless someone
comes up with a better name)
There are also a few places where "folio" is subordinate.
eg filemap_get_folio(), lruvec_stat_mod_folio()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 3:20 Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-22 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-22 12:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-22 13:41 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-04-22 15:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210422134114.GN3596236@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox