From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFB6C433C1 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8271560230 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:10:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8271560230 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C59FD6B007D; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C30FA6B007E; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AD1466B0080; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0238.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.238]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E506B007D for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44531180AD830 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77972492808.07.692061A Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F5F2000261 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i26so17541868lfl.1 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:10:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TrrPoo3NF06Hriy1kiCCzSGcqBJEQPrLMgSJHsg60T0=; b=MEEB4gQC+frgKiF9qxjZWukNl+J2hRwRFu7J1PqfnMfeey07tHMtQDPvdpfUrJMj+v ygJO68J8dLSogekKUyuyEXo8RQTJ807gbbBdBq6oagwJBdc2IRBWavSbj7y0TeaYGk7E 1GMkHLPx64SGknP3wTP3iIwhW/hsV3/W7y4ZI2wuMVuSBy4bV9ff4rSSppPkrnAbmDgR DUn7cyCOUbkSRIfa4trfe9SwiqvhtJKOiqg6ST1RQmHRJJnJUUL32FPYbRR2YeR7KN3I R5SyHZOtuaxGBK7ZXgmwHbpEg33N9z5EquYbNO9sYVg5nO/6x0zL17e5dB0XQojSvKub IXGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TrrPoo3NF06Hriy1kiCCzSGcqBJEQPrLMgSJHsg60T0=; b=O5FvdauUxb7dAI8eAlhxs7GQc7QN7JhV4HwbRHUSxDT0sIBuikbLn/YJzkGQFoXSH3 mIGagDVPrg1F1pll6clCm8ShlL/EHc+u0vAdNQqx6TR0rWaYhJ9DTraEBK6WXFhdv5EK p2lx0vSKBwnvT3NH6tPufcO8dyavAcLFDjxASKQR/V9j7UOCrAdyMGdfN7jihQ6u34Lh UGJ3PFeb96YYjE5HwCXQfOH76aiJakVgwqhPUYYQxCsAq0r2E/ybISyBQEc8k5tRu9gr +bJK4Iia4mYucTLHhvDVm91dhOxINz4V+AXxqlU0ygjps7k2c/dD3lfOUlYTEqxcuian ryWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533C16wQkULzzsph4ieg5lBTPPS6vnV2QboC/GzOOrjb/4PeAu8y S8zPjWkrCj0L3Q+g+cY0xxlIPg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFN60J7EkuzOGOBl18JQs7UDI+EF00tDUs2xAE6AjR6wmyHSPcLg0T1AveZfh8xHdfaQ/2vg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3089:: with SMTP id z9mr16097622lfd.496.1617012642015; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r66sm1776883lff.93.2021.03.29.03.10.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB6C5101FC8; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:10:40 +0300 (+03) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:10:40 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: "Yu, Yu-cheng" Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 18/28] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting Message-ID: <20210329101040.sra6aqvgjbmy72bj@box> References: <20210316151054.5405-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210316151054.5405-19-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20210322105729.24rt4nwc3blipxsr@box> <4b926140-66ac-f538-df94-8213b8a2ab86@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4b926140-66ac-f538-df94-8213b8a2ab86@intel.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 05F5F2000261 X-Stat-Signature: kk6i3b9mhq6ut53ye9mdeq6cwpnei3k1 Received-SPF: none (shutemov.name>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf18; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; client-ip=209.85.167.48 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617012643-833190 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:46:30AM -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote: > On 3/22/2021 3:57 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 08:10:44AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > > Account shadow stack pages to stack memory. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > > > --- > > > arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 7 +++++++ > > > include/linux/pgtable.h | 11 +++++++++++ > > > mm/mmap.c | 5 +++++ > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c > > > index 0f4fbf51a9fc..948d28c29964 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c > > > @@ -895,3 +895,10 @@ int pmd_free_pte_page(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr) > > > #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ > > > #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */ > > > + > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK > > > +bool arch_shadow_stack_mapping(vm_flags_t vm_flags) > > > +{ > > > + return (vm_flags & VM_SHSTK); > > > +} > > > +#endif > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h > > > index cbd98484c4f1..487c08df4365 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h > > > @@ -1470,6 +1470,17 @@ static inline pmd_t arch_maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_t pmd, struct vm_area_struct *vma > > > #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_MAYBE_MKWRITE */ > > > #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */ > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK > > > +bool arch_shadow_stack_mapping(vm_flags_t vm_flags); > > > +#else > > > +static inline bool arch_shadow_stack_mapping(vm_flags_t vm_flags) > > > +{ > > > + return false; > > > +} > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK */ > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */ > > > + > > > /* > > > * Architecture PAGE_KERNEL_* fallbacks > > > * > > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c > > > index 3f287599a7a3..2ac67882ace2 100644 > > > --- a/mm/mmap.c > > > +++ b/mm/mmap.c > > > @@ -1718,6 +1718,9 @@ static inline int accountable_mapping(struct file *file, vm_flags_t vm_flags) > > > if (file && is_file_hugepages(file)) > > > return 0; > > > + if (arch_shadow_stack_mapping(vm_flags)) > > > + return 1; > > > + > > > > What's wrong with testing (vm_flags & VM_SHSTK) here? VM_SHSTK is 0 on > > non-x86. > > > > > return (vm_flags & (VM_NORESERVE | VM_SHARED | VM_WRITE)) == VM_WRITE; > > > } > > > @@ -3387,6 +3390,8 @@ void vm_stat_account(struct mm_struct *mm, vm_flags_t flags, long npages) > > > mm->stack_vm += npages; > > > else if (is_data_mapping(flags)) > > > mm->data_vm += npages; > > > + else if (arch_shadow_stack_mapping(flags)) > > > + mm->stack_vm += npages; > > > > Ditto. > > > > The thought was, here all testings are done with helpers, e.g. > is_data_mapping(), so creating a helper for shadow stack is more inline with > the existing code. Or, maybe we can call it is_shadow_stack_mapping()? > And, since we have a helper, use it in accountable_mapping() as well. Or do > you have other suggestions? is_shadow_stack_mapping() sounds reasonable. My point is that we already have ifdef around #define VM_SHSTK. No need in duplicating it for helper. -- Kirill A. Shutemov