From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B49C433DB for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D023861934 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:03:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D023861934 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4D73D6B028B; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:03:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 486946B0292; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:03:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 327306B0294; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:03:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0104.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.104]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1645F6B028B for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:03:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin40.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48F418017377 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:03:02 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77953271004.40.B885016 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEBF407F8DB for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:03:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ak58R9ppaBaibHUKtsrX/8kQSpkyoQcxYj1ybi6FKGg=; b=XnVPA8W+06Gb4w5qHIAcSFjSbu LgG4D0IIObSiMqKNNUNIv9JA+Mf+aQxaHeSjSKnIg0jUyB4sPr8/OL5YsLBFvXeO6awA77Wc3pFKv sKSIvUwzlq1ETQpM7lCp1tRZ8uoNbjzuhNZL4iiURfzCdrfPSVfzoGXncw+eg7swztK0ACN2jHtWV V/uDgDDY4lFGN/ydCJVSrI4+OByhWOM0a1M/w9T8azFAcqEIXMVB+wkNEjylahsX24xccK/EuQU3v zXMPnzZp2ImBULAkZ07HH++gK25Qe9pb2VdXi4/CCnkyBkpTb4+TCS9xPXqOl1thSogfev5E+5wxh NeJwujJw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lOtmq-00AqRi-HN; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:02:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:02:24 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, surenb@google.com, joaodias@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, digetx@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm: cma: support sysfs Message-ID: <20210324030224.GO1719932@casper.infradead.org> References: <20210323195050.2577017-1-minchan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210323195050.2577017-1-minchan@kernel.org> X-Stat-Signature: r3t9frxdkhog9hndutr3781tqo95be9h X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9CEBF407F8DB Received-SPF: none (infradead.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf17; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=casper.infradead.org; client-ip=90.155.50.34 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616554980-737881 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:50:50PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote: > + /* the number of CMA page successful allocations */ > + atomic64_t nr_pages_succeeded; > +void cma_sysfs_alloc_pages_count(struct cma *cma, size_t count) > +{ > + atomic64_add(count, &cma->nr_pages_succeeded); > +} I don't understand. A size_t is a byte count. But the variable is called 'nr_pages'. So which is it, a byte count or a page count? > +static ssize_t alloc_pages_success_show(struct kobject *kobj, > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + struct cma_kobject *cma_kobj = container_of(kobj, > + struct cma_kobject, kobj); > + struct cma *cma = cma_kobj->cma; > + > + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", > + atomic64_read(&cma->nr_pages_succeeded)); ... if it's in bytes, it should probably be reported in kilobytes and be suffixed with a 'K' like many other stats.