linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	peterx@redhat.com, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/23] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:48:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323004912.35132-3-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210323004912.35132-1-peterx@redhat.com>

pte_unmap_same() will always unmap the pte pointer.  After the unmap, vmf->pte
will not be valid any more.  We should clear it.

It was safe only because no one is accessing vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same()
returns, since the only caller of pte_unmap_same() (so far) is do_swap_page(),
where vmf->pte will in most cases be overwritten very soon.

pte_unmap_same() will be used in other places in follow up patches, so that
vmf->pte will not always be re-written.  This patch enables us to call
functions like finish_fault() because that'll conditionally unmap the pte by
checking vmf->pte first.  Or, alloc_set_pte() will make sure to allocate a new
pte even after calling pte_unmap_same().

Since we'll need to modify vmf->pte, directly pass in vmf into pte_unmap_same()
and then we can also avoid the long parameter list.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index a458a595331f..d534eba85756 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2607,19 +2607,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apply_to_existing_page_range);
  * proceeding (but do_wp_page is only called after already making such a check;
  * and do_anonymous_page can safely check later on).
  */
-static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
-				pte_t *page_table, pte_t orig_pte)
+static inline int pte_unmap_same(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
 	int same = 1;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
 	if (sizeof(pte_t) > sizeof(unsigned long)) {
-		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd);
+		spinlock_t *ptl = pte_lockptr(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
 		spin_lock(ptl);
-		same = pte_same(*page_table, orig_pte);
+		same = pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte);
 		spin_unlock(ptl);
 	}
 #endif
-	pte_unmap(page_table);
+	pte_unmap(vmf->pte);
+	/* After unmap of pte, the pointer is invalid now - clear it. */
+	vmf->pte = NULL;
 	return same;
 }
 
@@ -3308,7 +3309,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	vm_fault_t ret = 0;
 	void *shadow = NULL;
 
-	if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))
+	if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
 		goto out;
 
 	entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
-- 
2.26.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23  0:48 [PATCH 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 01/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-03-23  2:34   ` [PATCH 02/23] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns Miaohe Lin
2021-03-23 15:40     ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 03/23] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 04/23] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 05/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 06/23] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 07/23] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
2021-03-23  2:11   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-23 15:43     ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 08/23] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 09/23] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:48 ` [PATCH 10/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 11/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 12/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 13/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 14/23] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 15/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2021-04-21 22:02   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 16/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-04-21 23:06   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-22  1:14     ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 17/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2021-04-22 18:22   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  0:49 ` [PATCH 18/23] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
2021-04-22 19:00   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 19/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
2021-04-22 22:45   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-26  2:08     ` Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 20/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2021-04-23  0:08   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 21/23] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2021-04-23 20:33   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-26 21:16     ` Peter Xu
2021-04-26 21:36       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-26 22:05         ` Peter Xu
2021-04-26 23:09           ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 22/23] mm/userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:50 ` [PATCH 23/23] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-03-23  0:54 ` [PATCH 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-04-21 16:03 ` Peter Xu
2021-04-21 21:39   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-22  1:16     ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210323004912.35132-3-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox