From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9CDC433C1 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9ED61972 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:36:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D9ED61972 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9BBA36B0120; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:36:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 992A66B0122; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:36:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 833C16B0123; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:36:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0202.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.202]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D0C6B0120 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:36:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136061E1E for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:36:32 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77948970624.30.369F2FE Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com [209.85.208.178]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1E82000267 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id y1so23075326ljm.10 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mpzmIKAPcKhQtzYyIXUYOF1ItUjRTXPYExMYO0CNpAI=; b=q59dRq8LPT5NuAXozTLhzFs3UUJSV2/CImjHV8aNWVexC0NDwlOQX/AFa1Qrv36oOI QO5eeW/PSFktIY8/B4zFarq8YT0di8kKJq6F1SGRsZ4eM41+zex+MWlUt/tB6XV7aHl0 Xk/8t34XWyfleOj3DNd8NDx+PWaAL98jqV50rwbMIkS//ZjXdd1ua63JsmLBxAiiqVSB 2o7kvDEV18WlmSksxl68V/Nw3MqHwKMZjwAM01h5Cpgp6gXC4Vu3gRWemvXJrzT2LPQb CLkzw2TZ02kvhAgJ0XNHrVbUj1yx09J9NjU3CBblhKDOkmPkYhO4vmyN/AD4jZch0PwD Byng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mpzmIKAPcKhQtzYyIXUYOF1ItUjRTXPYExMYO0CNpAI=; b=X/mnxCa6CBUCmbb4EeyLMk6XI+p1m95yLQwNynAV5GZaGTGXNyGoPw0J0GSfaRHdov N5LQ491kwYH5EAVLMlw7bgvQeuOJriHB+38pQAJrgQq58QC45MKRLXcLlGrOHDgElviW QKW6L80zh0OdLZ6Wqb1x4JAd7P8irnEkogK878y4LCuwoH3Xu11bKsnDgVMN7yb+4DSO 6lAO1K3vicBGwgYhrtrwTOLYXKaQXVUEXd0hHCWBU5g0IqgmIh3xVXWX3NKv57c4PbL5 x6s5bhEp1/EuHTlqt2/rTXySTV2vp+tidUq+AtoCTKSGlCb7tk7sMiDMkMkYe7GUCYEa 9hIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DIR39i2u1fF6FmWwc4MtnQ/jqgbPgbvtxSHsCR7QqaBWUsoe9 5PVq24ZwNXqkqoVhTbkpSIg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNI0elgQQ7M2BGp1dyNfIDJPJd/GPCp8n8ASfqTPsAJxhFII+j3AOf6mTTvPEHmq/BdPWcQw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8541:: with SMTP id u1mr983993ljj.446.1616452582040; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc638.lan (h5ef52e3d.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i12sm1199593lfv.220.2021.03.22.15.36.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:36:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:36:19 +0100 To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Uladzislau Rezki , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/vmalloc: Use kvmalloc to allocate the table of pages Message-ID: <20210322223619.GA56503@pc638.lan> References: <20210322193820.2140045-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210322193820.2140045-2-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210322193820.2140045-2-willy@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Stat-Signature: oe9g7iesdh1hddq4ux3h9pnp4fhq5s6d X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8C1E82000267 Received-SPF: none (gmail.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf18; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; client-ip=209.85.208.178 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616452585-362445 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 07:38:20PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > If we're trying to allocate 4MB of memory, the table will be 8KiB in size > (1024 pointers * 8 bytes per pointer), which can usually be satisfied > by a kmalloc (which is significantly faster). Instead of changing this > open-coded implementation, just use kvmalloc(). > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 96444d64129a..32b640a84250 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2802,13 +2802,8 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask, > gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM; > > /* Please note that the recursion is strictly bounded. */ > - if (array_size > PAGE_SIZE) { > - pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp, node, > + pages = kvmalloc_node_caller(array_size, nested_gfp, node, > area->caller); > - } else { > - pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node); > - } > - > if (!pages) { > free_vm_area(area); > return NULL; > -- > 2.30.2 Makes sense to me. Though i expected a bigger difference: # patch single CPU, 4MB allocation, loops: 1000000 avg: 85293854 usec # default single CPU, 4MB allocation, loops: 1000000 avg: 89275857 usec One question. Should we care much about fragmentation? I mean with the patch, allocations > 2MB will do request to SLAB bigger then PAGE_SIZE. Thanks! -- Vlad Rezki