Re: Issue with kfence and kmemleak

[Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>]

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 07:47:00PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> One thing I've just run into: "BUG: KFENCE: out-of-bounds read in
> scan_block+0x6b/0x170 mm/kmemleak.c:1244"
> 
> Probably because kmemleak is passed the rounded size for the size-class,
> and not the real allocation size. Can this be fixed with
> kmemleak_ignore() only called on the KFENCE guard pages?

If it's only on the occasional object, you can do a
kmemleak_scan_area() but some care needed as this in turn allocates
memory for kmemleak internal metadata.

> I'd like kmemleak to scan the valid portion of an object allocated
> through KFENCE, but no further than that.
> 
> Or do we need to fix the size if it's a kfence object:
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index c0014d3b91c1..fe6e3ae8e8c6 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/kasan.h>
> +#include <linux/kfence.h>
>  #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>  #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
>  
> @@ -589,7 +590,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size,
>  	atomic_set(&object->use_count, 1);
>  	object->flags = OBJECT_ALLOCATED;
>  	object->pointer = ptr;
> -	object->size = size;
> +	object->size = kfence_ksize((void *)ptr) ?: size;
>  	object->excess_ref = 0;
>  	object->min_count = min_count;
>  	object->count = 0;			/* white color initially */
> 
> The alternative is to call kfence_ksize() in slab_post_alloc_hook() when
> calling kmemleak_alloc.

One of these is probably the easiest. If kfence only works on slab
objects, better to pass the right size from slab_post_alloc_hook(). If
you plan to expand it later to vmalloc(), just fix the size in
create_object().

-- 
Catalin