From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"Ben Gardon" <bgardon@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Dimitri Sivanich" <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mmu_notifiers: Esnure range_end() is paired with range_start()
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:28:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311232847.GA2710221@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311180057.1582638-1-seanjc@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:00:57AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> If one or more notifiers fails .invalidate_range_start(), invoke
> .invalidate_range_end() for "all" notifiers. If there are multiple
> notifiers, those that did not fail are expecting _start() and _end() to
> be paired, e.g. KVM's mmu_notifier_count would become imbalanced.
> Disallow notifiers that can fail _start() from implementing _end() so
> that it's unnecessary to either track which notifiers rejected _start(),
> or had already succeeded prior to a failed _start().
>
> Note, the existing behavior of calling _start() on all notifiers even
> after a previous notifier failed _start() was an unintented "feature".
> Make it canon now that the behavior is depended on for correctness.
>
> As of today, the bug is likely benign:
>
> 1. The only caller of the non-blocking notifier is OOM kill.
> 2. The only notifiers that can fail _start() are the i915 and Nouveau
> drivers.
> 3. The only notifiers that utilize _end() are the SGI UV GRU driver
> and KVM.
> 4. The GRU driver will never coincide with the i195/Nouveau drivers.
> 5. An imbalanced kvm->mmu_notifier_count only causes soft lockup in the
> _guest_, and the guest is already doomed due to being an OOM victim.
>
> Fix the bug now to play nice with future usage, e.g. KVM has a potential
> use case for blocking memslot updates in KVM while an invalidation is
> in-progress, and failure to unblock would result in said updates being
> blocked indefinitely and hanging.
>
> Found by inspection. Verified by adding a second notifier in KVM that
> periodically returns -EAGAIN on non-blockable ranges, triggering OOM,
> and observing that KVM exits with an elevated notifier count.
>
> Fixes: 93065ac753e4 ("mm, oom: distinguish blockable mode for mmu notifiers")
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
> v2: Reimplemented as suggested by Jason. Only functional change relative
> to Jason's suggestion is to check invalidate_range_end before calling to
> avoid a NULL pointer dereference. I also added more comments, hopefully
> they're helpful...
>
> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210310213117.1444147-1-seanjc@google.com
Looks fine, thanks. I think you need some commit message remark to
discourage backporting, the added WARN_ON will trigger on older
kernels that have many more things implementing
invalidate_range_end(). It should not be backported to anything that
has more invalidate_range_ends()'s than today's kernel.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 18:00 Sean Christopherson
2021-03-11 23:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311232847.GA2710221@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox