From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B910C433DB for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF1764EEC for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:03:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCF1764EEC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 452F46B0005; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:03:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 3DBF06B0006; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:03:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1E0C06B0007; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:03:41 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0050.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22786B0005 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:03:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F20D99AE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77879487000.04.1707960 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF080192FE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:03:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614798216; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UoLMKstBrKdSmL1aXA1VyV0RNHRz4sF2B9MnCUrQmn0=; b=caJTaH9jJR9HW0Hez6Cd8sQ4tlv8qihyigkP/4GGQlv6y6830jZi+AbFKrGmqI5MOKOvcR echxg0uEQf48ZyY9KlbwXikBRflM3w47yNHrjvZNslvKzQgini0BP9ICC6kDia75f9lzkb PYcu+5Ggjyx7LbG8rmMCy0Ql1tnXdEE= Received: from mail-qt1-f199.google.com (mail-qt1-f199.google.com [209.85.160.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-333-KpyTdIbZN8mS9EXj-mjDJQ-1; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 14:03:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KpyTdIbZN8mS9EXj-mjDJQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f199.google.com with SMTP id o7so16789729qtw.7 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:03:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UoLMKstBrKdSmL1aXA1VyV0RNHRz4sF2B9MnCUrQmn0=; b=BCC1s0EbrYSaaxI6ujMWpeA3mbIu6n7vB6uv1g1XFVCynX2p92Ddi/wQTqKemJ6Ezp 4g5x9YLlFdse7YoaIFk9U9UPoT9PyogJXrzTbiS+Pxi6JEmr9KkJIzAoNkuU2SrqcD73 5NjVS8YxAubkgFbOAxlp2XEJBKuULow1yuiekVZC4LmjIR1cJAIEXmjpEQ3T3RFuuNgW SPpEWLJyP59hAqfLwNwGkYQlJqTGM8C3HxMK4epz4w1IE0lMenfGvA0uIbUZEVPkVmo0 QVOYsA8XW3XkglwDYtwUVYeEWqPJNQjCHHs7nxe4Qe3PwoXAkTA4bz1sglTUscw3jdTu q2WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sgjKxb0qXC5rgRFzk2n3UGzNzSnnF1g6VrU7sASFMzBPLqZBM ZP/yduvhelK9LLzJ86qrTXWhIlsScQg903nmDr0Vgl2pf+WG1caG2KQigU9E3Mug2fwj83GSuKx 3cfoK3FgxwCI= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b49f:: with SMTP id c31mr604263qve.35.1614798213380; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:03:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5PF37P+ynLvSYll0RMVL0A9E5K1GNnpbcQIBu/Q3dkFlUVNkM/Ivi1uWHgnQdBHCXB/sDwA== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:b49f:: with SMTP id c31mr603966qve.35.1614798209781; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from xz-x1 (bras-vprn-toroon474qw-lp130-25-174-95-95-253.dsl.bell.ca. [174.95.95.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z65sm15976988qtd.15.2021.03.03.11.03.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:03:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:03:27 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: Nadav Amit Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Nadav Amit , Andrea Arcangeli , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Minchan Kim , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , stable@vger.kernel.org, Yu Zhao Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] mm/userfaultfd: fix memory corruption due to writeprotect Message-ID: <20210303190327.GV397383@xz-x1> References: <20210303095702.3814618-1-namit@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210303095702.3814618-1-namit@vmware.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Stat-Signature: zqw5es3jqtfw355oi7db6bhamknwyaeo X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3BAF080192FE Received-SPF: none (redhat.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf27; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; client-ip=216.205.24.124 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614798215-597237 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:57:02AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: > From: Nadav Amit > > Userfaultfd self-test fails occasionally, indicating a memory > corruption. It's failing very constantly now for me after I got it run on a 40 cores system... While indeed not easy to fail on my laptop. [...] > Fixes: 292924b26024 ("userfaultfd: wp: apply _PAGE_UFFD_WP bit") > Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit > > --- > v2->v3: > * Do not acquire mmap_lock for write, flush conditionally instead [Yu] > * Change the fixes tag to the patch that made the race apparent [Yu] Did you forget about this one? It would still be good to point to 09854ba94c6a just to show that 5.7/5.8 stable branches shouldn't need this patch as they're not prone to the tlb data curruption. Maybe also cc stable with 5.9+? > * Removing patch to avoid write-protect on uffd unprotect. More > comprehensive solution to follow (and avoid the TLB flush as well). > --- > mm/memory.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 9e8576a83147..06da04f98936 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -3092,6 +3092,13 @@ static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_WP); > } > > + /* > + * Userfaultfd write-protect can defer flushes. Ensure the TLB > + * is flushed in this case before copying. > + */ > + if (userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma) && mm_tlb_flush_pending(vmf->vma->vm_mm)) > + flush_tlb_page(vmf->vma, vmf->address); > + > vmf->page = vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, vmf->orig_pte); > if (!vmf->page) { > /* > -- > 2.25.1 > Thanks for being consistent on fixing this problem. Maybe it's even better to put that into a "unlikely" to reduce the affect of normal do_wp_page as much as possible? But I'll leave it to others. If with the fixes tag modified: Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Tested-by: Peter Xu Thanks, -- Peter Xu