From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
<rcampbell@nvidia.com>, <jglisse@redhat.com>, <hch@infradead.org>,
<daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:05:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302000559.GA763995@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210226071832.31547-6-apopple@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 06:18:29PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +/**
> + * make_device_exclusive_range() - Mark a range for exclusive use by a device
> + * @mm: mm_struct of assoicated target process
> + * @start: start of the region to mark for exclusive device access
> + * @end: end address of region
> + * @pages: returns the pages which were successfully mark for exclusive acces
> + *
> + * Returns: number of pages successfully marked for exclusive access
> + *
> + * This function finds the ptes mapping page(s) to the given address range and
> + * replaces them with special swap entries preventing userspace CPU access. On
> + * fault these entries are replaced with the original mapping after calling MMU
> + * notifiers.
> + */
> +int make_device_exclusive_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> + unsigned long end, struct page **pages)
> +{
> + long npages = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + long i;
> +
> + npages = get_user_pages_remote(mm, start, npages,
> + FOLL_GET | FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_SPLIT_PMD,
> + pages, NULL, NULL);
> + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> + if (!trylock_page(pages[i])) {
> + put_page(pages[i]);
> + pages[i] = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (!try_to_protect(pages[i])) {
Isn't this racy? get_user_pages returns the ptes at an instant in
time, they could have already been changed to something else?
I would think you'd want to switch to the swap entry atomically under
th PTLs?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-02 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-26 7:18 [PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-02 8:52 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-01 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-02 0:21 ` Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-01 17:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-01 16:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-04 4:27 ` Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <E93F89E1-3CE2-4CA3-97D9-6BCED78E1001@nvidia.com>
2021-03-04 23:54 ` Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-03-01 17:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-01 22:55 ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-02 0:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-03-02 8:57 ` Alistair Popple
[not found] ` <20210302124152.GF4247@nvidia.com>
2021-03-04 5:20 ` Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-03-01 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-01 18:07 ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-01 23:14 ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-02 9:12 ` Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-02-26 7:18 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210302000559.GA763995@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox