From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/page_alloc: drop pr_info_ratelimited() in alloc_contig_range()
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:05:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210301220512.GA4425@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210301150945.77012-1-david@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:09:45PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> The information that some PFNs are busy is:
> a) not helpful for ordinary users: we don't even know *who* called
> alloc_contig_range(). This is certainly not worth a pr_info.*().
> b) not really helpful for debugging: we don't have any details *why*
> these PFNs are busy, and that is what we usually care about.
> c) not complete: there are other cases where we fail alloc_contig_range()
> using different paths that are not getting recorded.
>
> For example, we reach this path once we succeeded in isolating pageblocks,
> but failed to migrate some pages - which can happen easily on
> ZONE_NORMAL (i.e., has_unmovable_pages() is racy) but also on ZONE_MOVABLE
> i.e., we would have to retry longer to migrate).
>
> For example via virtio-mem when unplugging memory, we can create quite
> some noise (especially with ZONE_NORMAL) that is not of interest to
> users - it's expected that some allocations may fail as memory is busy.
>
> Let's just drop that pr_info_ratelimit() and rather implement a dynamic
> debugging mechanism in the future that can give us a better reason why
> alloc_contig_range() failed on specific pages.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-01 15:09 David Hildenbrand
2021-03-01 15:35 ` Zi Yan
2021-03-01 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-01 22:05 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210301220512.GA4425@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox