From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5FBC433E0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB2B64E21 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:13:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1BB2B64E21 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9701C8D0008; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:13:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 920038D0002; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:13:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7E8C08D0008; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:13:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0166.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.166]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681488D0002 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:13:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD8C180ACEE4 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:13:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77861368200.29.EEDCF78 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37BFA0004D0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B30C564E21; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:13:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1614366817; bh=Kfr0cv3tqktInH3qWJssH76pM9diuI7WbIFKMCvEcpY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VRn6HV9VKGXpux2I3XsqXD4ceCl8favZEBnQiEOsdeJJZFDI2Uw35b2D0PYUG3vqF BVr/WHIcvcaaVKR6zWyRm6KzIauPaXKLB+ChW/gXKxgDw+XFcnaMJSsheEEbmWnErg BdTAnUySyfN9zCf6IcRao30Q4AzeeebSxwhyMLcg= Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:13:36 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: kernel test robot Cc: Linux Memory Management List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f Message-Id: <20210226111336.91a89c0f5230eae69196f71e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <6039178e.nIA6K0eHFcbkwcNB%lkp@intel.com> References: <6039178e.nIA6K0eHFcbkwcNB%lkp@intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E37BFA0004D0 X-Stat-Signature: hqe8dmrksu1qqty4x3tuzhdf6gsi5936 Received-SPF: none (linux-foundation.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf15; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614366816-954528 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:45:18 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > branch HEAD: d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f Add linux-next specific files for 20210226 > > ... > > page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe028): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance' > riscv32-linux-ld: page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe02c): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance' > > ... > > |-- riscv-randconfig-p001-20210226 > | |-- page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to-node_reclaim_distance > | `-- riscv32-linux-ld:page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to-node_reclaim_distance I assume the riscv randconfig managed to create a .config with CONFIG_NUMA=n, CONFIG_SMP=y. Configuration doesn't make a lot of sense, unless someone has a single-CPU machine with cpuless nodes... Could the riscv maintainers please test and merge this? --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig~a +++ a/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice # Common NUMA Features config NUMA bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" + depends on SMP select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA select OF_NUMA select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING _