From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83783C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB14464EFA for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:14:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CB14464EFA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3C79D8D001F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:14:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 377758D0005; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:14:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 28DDC8D001F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:14:48 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0143.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.143]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F94A8D0005 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:14:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBF618065946 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77856835014.15.654AC92 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071ADE for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC167AF6F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 98146DA790; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:12:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:12:52 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Ira Weiny Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Sterba , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kmap conversions for 5.12 Message-ID: <20210225131252.GA7604@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Ira Weiny , Linus Torvalds , David Sterba , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM References: <20210223192506.GY3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20210224123049.GX1993@twin.jikos.cz> <20210224175912.GA3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210224175912.GA3014244@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) X-Stat-Signature: o918sb8wmpy7jrabdy5xpmsy6kiwb58m X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5071ADE Received-SPF: none (suse.cz>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf29; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1614258887-340922 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 09:59:12AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:30:49PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:25:06AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:13:42AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:03 AM David Sterba wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Sorry. I will change it. > > > > Let me know how you want to proceed with the patchset/pull request. > > To be clear I'd like to just drop the 2 patches which use zero_user() for this > merge window. > > I've already submitted some additional btrfs changes for 5.13[1]. I can rework > these zero_user() patches and submit them through Andrew for 5.13 as separate > set. That is what I meant by 'I will change it'. > > > I > > can play the messenger again but now it seems a round of review is > > needed and with some testing it'll be possible in some -rc. At that > > point you may take the patches via the mm tree, unless Linus is ok with > > a late pull. > > I'm ok with delaying the memzero_page() change to 5.13. There are a lot of > kmap changes to come. But I'm trying to do them as smaller series just for > this reason. I don't want valid changes to be denied due to my messing up just > a few patches... :-( Hopefully you and Linus can forgive me on this one. > > Is ok to just drop them and merge the rest of this series in 5.12? Ok, no problem. Please let me know exactly which patches to drop, I'll respin the branch. Thanks.