From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AD0C433E0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30C664F09 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:04:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F30C664F09 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 251936B008C; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:04:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1D9D88D0003; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:04:01 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F41808D0001; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:04:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0148.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.148]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED136B008C for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:04:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C1EFB62 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:04:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77854237440.25.3DD9C17 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD0380192C0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E65B264F2F; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:03:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1614197039; bh=QqTMeJTbGJz/dCouHrhTiGyDXHQTRy1K8qh2winai+g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=ciRXpoESzD+p9ZztBT1g0MSZArxQlGEmnhiU1WjUpvuymDEzfXp2GBdKDFpdRIAVc PnesOG00K0r1DdCe4XvlhPuSR37iEMd0kFNL/jBiMzjZtBw6ewhXSkZknFGJiSx3Q0 EMAZ2w8NAsiQRoCyD86lm2n8V8drO1ZD+tAM+cz4= Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:03:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: [patch 067/173] mm: kmem: make __memcg_kmem_(un)charge static Message-ID: <20210224200358.hE1s6mymp%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210224115824.1e289a6895087f10c41dd8d6@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 X-Stat-Signature: 4t1s37dnfspo13tqn7izbb9eutabsmuk X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8CD0380192C0 Received-SPF: none (linux-foundation.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf16; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614197039-196946 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Roman Gushchin Subject: mm: kmem: make __memcg_kmem_(un)charge static I've noticed that __memcg_kmem_charge() and __memcg_kmem_uncharge() are not used anywhere except memcontrol.c. Yet they are not declared as non-static and are declared in memcontrol.h. This patch makes them static. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210108020332.4096911-1-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 --- mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++++++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h~mm-kmem-make-__memcg_kmem_uncharge-static +++ a/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -1592,9 +1592,6 @@ static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bi #endif #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM -int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, - unsigned int nr_pages); -void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages); int __memcg_kmem_charge_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order); void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order); --- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-kmem-make-__memcg_kmem_uncharge-static +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ struct cgroup_subsys_state *vmpressure_t #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM extern spinlock_t css_set_lock; +static int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, + unsigned int nr_pages); +static void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + unsigned int nr_pages); + static void obj_cgroup_release(struct percpu_ref *ref) { struct obj_cgroup *objcg = container_of(ref, struct obj_cgroup, refcnt); @@ -3087,8 +3092,8 @@ static void memcg_free_cache_id(int id) * * Returns 0 on success, an error code on failure. */ -int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, - unsigned int nr_pages) +static int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp, + unsigned int nr_pages) { struct page_counter *counter; int ret; @@ -3120,7 +3125,7 @@ int __memcg_kmem_charge(struct mem_cgrou * @memcg: memcg to uncharge * @nr_pages: number of pages to uncharge */ -void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages) +static void __memcg_kmem_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages) { if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys)) page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages); _