linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Łukasz Majczak" <lma@semihalf.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, "Qian Cai" <cai@lca.pw>,
	"Sarvela, Tomi P" <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:24:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215212440.GA1307762@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCo4Lyio1h2Heixh@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:00:31AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 14-02-21 20:00:16, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:18:20PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > We can correctly set the zone links for the reserved pages for holes in the
> > middle of a zone based on the architecture constraints and with only the
> > holes in the beginning/end of the memory will be not spanned by any
> > node/zone which in practice does not seem to be a problem as the VM_BUG_ON
> > in set_pfnblock_flags_mask() never triggered on pfn 0.
> 
> I really fail to see what you mean by correct zone/node for a memory
> range which is not associated with any real node.

We know architectural zone constraints, so we can have always have 1:1
match from pfn to zone. Node indeed will be a guess.
  
> > > I am sorry, I haven't followed previous discussions. Has the removal of
> > > the VM_BUG_ON been considered as an immediate workaround?
> > 
> > It was never discussed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> > 
> > Judging by the commit message that introduced the VM_BUG_ON (commit
> > 86051ca5eaf5 ("mm: fix usemap initialization")) there was yet another
> > inconsistency in the memory map that required a special care.
> 
> Can we actually explore that path before adding yet additional
> complexity and potentially a very involved fix for a subtle problem?

This patch was intended as a fix for inconsistency of the memory map that
is the root cause for triggering this VM_BUG_ON and other corner case
problems. 

The previous version [1] is less involved as it does not extend node/zone
spans.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210130221035.4169-3-rppt@kernel.org
-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-15 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 11:08 Mike Rapoport
2021-02-08 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-08 21:25   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12  9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12  9:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:11     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:37         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 17:29     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  8:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-16 11:13         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 13:18     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 18:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  9:00         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15  9:05           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-15 21:24           ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-02-16  8:33             ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 11:01               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16 11:39                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 12:34                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 12:59                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 13:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 16:39                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 17:49                       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-17 12:27                         ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210215212440.GA1307762@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lma@semihalf.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox