From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC61C433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B97F64DF2 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:23:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0B97F64DF2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 58CA96B006E; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:23:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 53C486B0070; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:23:56 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 405456B0071; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:23:56 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0209.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.209]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214CF6B006E for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:23:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DABD1647E for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:23:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77799402030.25.sack02_3f06f4d27609 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159FB1827BAE1 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:23:55 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: sack02_3f06f4d27609 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3983 Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) by imf44.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id s3so24821807edi.7 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:23:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fK8oEiCpaigib7LB0udlJczFBXRNeR3GDTUC3nFVlXE=; b=YW1BXSdPgXi3ypQahjMdIf2FhV1klbho6FNbEUtPcPUnRDR/3qnq+32njSSJSKGxfH PHjPB9u3DS0LNUE1MloDZcBDnpHVpwPH8qN61+wTp4KUCtiNAOTJWZWU0DxWidi6eK5Z zVE1/oa2sr+AJ5ZWReIiSiZYKr4JWg9992NJMJCpXbKMJ4fFjGSzKIjpQpHrJkw8kTsi RF2jseyoCqmWxm0apLRWKtLCBLXKhsvZlxuETlKopk6AqXlHOCVuOcmawYm1fo6043bY iLtOftqFA8NN1njN+GJMzfHQ+Y0HaswdTX6QSsqgn6tRhD3cBQy1QrdolvyL0uCJUiRX t6zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=fK8oEiCpaigib7LB0udlJczFBXRNeR3GDTUC3nFVlXE=; b=R6NWNTSqU9+1eBHydQL/XCt1HmclWbgY1S403MgP8Zq4I5WgMVa0P5flP9oa7Isp2F m2SFNdymPdOHoE5zwiZESHyojrRethoYzECiV0HtwrgxOWwlyP9xIRbCmjf5WiztFIUQ b5jY+nesavjybpv54S0jFSPElmNOXD8Rdjclb5KEloTOIDDkOHtuNCAPedr1Ogjw786W hNL8ye/7PCuLalYOm82hhAdvOwfv0EurnXeBzYjL2YhMvAiH/WAo1HGKKnJzbUSG6t3F fvcezwbpwtG0F4RwRXVvcw1YWyKr4jzud8k6H94E74eJy+pH/PfmpiC7BzraqAJkiY6x UaVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530p/J6KJ+RULfVL+qmPsj0NUX6wsq2et/+SljEC1GAEhsfrthHR KRjXBVlfzPCUuH0YpyAzKTA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYZxKEGWXPdAV4QZ3JqVALdobqD5EsiFJIeLwGIDFM4QdLT1dJdvwKMyLAsXrvoUCcVFVM8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b86:: with SMTP id cf6mr19240192edb.269.1612891433484; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf (5-12-227-87.residential.rdsnet.ro. [5.12.227.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w24sm10877030ejn.36.2021.02.09.09.23.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:23:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:23:51 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: George McCollister Cc: Souptick Joarder , kernel test robot , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Linux Memory Management List , Jakub Kicinski , Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3824/6048] drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_i2c.c:127:34: warning: unused variable 'xrs700x_i2c_dt_ids' Message-ID: <20210209172351.ovvf6nhhagbiwzih@skbuf> References: <202102070252.HkjUQntk-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:18:12AM -0600, George McCollister wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:33 AM Souptick Joarder wrote: > > I think, this can defined under #ifdef CONFIG_OF. > > Was this robot reporting this warning for other DSA drivers? A lot of > them appear to use of_device_id in the same manner (unless I'm missing > something). Do we need to do something DSA wide to deal with this? Probably not DSA-wide since we still have drivers that probe on platform data and not OF (dsa_loop), but individual drivers should have "depends on OF" in Kconfig as far as I can tell.