From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3CBC433DB for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 14:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8170764DF2 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 14:48:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8170764DF2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shutemov.name Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B088F6B0006; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:48:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AB8266B006C; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:48:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9CEA76B006E; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:48:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0150.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.150]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF4F6B0006 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:48:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57521180AD817 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77791752948.04.care38_581538d275f6 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E598007926 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: care38_581538d275f6 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3623 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 14:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id u4so13590917ljh.6 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:48:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qKrGjMsJ2R/wga9q4+pn/NmKvq5OElvJA2x+qTmkZTI=; b=uFaCoiDYN20xnwCUk4f532jwqC6NHEeSj3iq2X42NqbkSxSXgF4UNpAw/eTTnAKsmG 3cSu3B5lQ5kV5Lv1zUCUqh4C4kdIXfIfqvscuf6wtuYRodzJYlE+bhucTCg9RScJX4Yv iR6yH5ifqPbeZKw2PqdtiINb33yYrnIq1/cEN9vhPjMiL0LkpL/dy1swGhS9RVrZYaPn skbZDQM0LsbP90lwZgZDjO+3ppk2WGN81f7AKv7P/hhZs9zClMc9I89QjwcJ9ACC+QWR dyLqBtjMf1EC3eYvl/zfcvQde2FIUscN8ZxCP25D+0umqiW4lmSn/fah7mV41rBrGS8d Zu3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qKrGjMsJ2R/wga9q4+pn/NmKvq5OElvJA2x+qTmkZTI=; b=L8sP2qOr91qgxoTxy8qANcictw5CZkbiEfwtXkHQJLM2IyJxmUbGnvo4KYo0BbEpn/ TbgbHWOFgoV8oj77MzYXGzteVZTsd5GVRaxbZalpulRUX9LY+AbO7iyblRm15aj/cJ+D TgGw81kkuiv/NxRJyrrqWrMFDJ8WzCPvM7Yf5k8E+suj1aw1d6d78oxD8D8P6VuV8v/c 6nn+DM35gDz3V4Fd9eQlLaoLFaNFaaJvYgIbD2nQ4cvXAsQg7Hd9FGIylaCQ04C1OG9O ImBmHm5KGbBc4Q/MhH3/0AIV5CH443Gc4kK94HpdncLxaYbqdnmiuT4BLjGCJTgPQG9d 6ocA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327NLYpvu1Q0m3dIVc0YtfK7alxP48uy3U/up7JVb+ubpJ8O8DD 3YPrWGar+1FoRl4chzM+26woIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCtIXWoN14cTukcsDy1HFKEGeNL4JqO5A+rU9fFhRMnBE6xpJR7Dxy2sxYNAq1EtXCwIuDqA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88b:: with SMTP id r11mr8376986ljp.187.1612709312222; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:48:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14sm1718244lfo.189.2021.02.07.06.48.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 370C2101B7A; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:48:31 +0300 (+03) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:48:31 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Seth Forshee Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Chris Down , Amir Goldstein , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Disallow CONFIG_TMPFS_INODE64 on s390 Message-ID: <20210207144831.lsrm74ypbz7i37uz@box> References: <20210205230620.518245-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210205230620.518245-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000015, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:06:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > This feature requires ino_t be 64-bits, which is true for every > 64-bit architecture but s390, so prevent this option from being > selected there. Quick grep suggests the same for alpha. Am I wrong? -- Kirill A. Shutemov