linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: Expose SYS_kcmp by default
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 03:25:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202102060325.uqZRgPog-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205163752.11932-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11511 bytes --]

Hi Chris,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on kees/for-next/seccomp kees/for-next/pstore linus/master v5.11-rc6 next-20210125]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chris-Wilson/kernel-Expose-SYS_kcmp-by-default/20210206-004006
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2ab38c17aac10bf55ab3efde4c4db3893d8691d2
config: powerpc-randconfig-r023-20210205 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c9439ca36342fb6013187d0a69aef92736951476)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/f7694e48ae81aac5a226e74421dbda1dcdc3ca92
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Chris-Wilson/kernel-Expose-SYS_kcmp-by-default/20210206-004006
        git checkout f7694e48ae81aac5a226e74421dbda1dcdc3ca92
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
   DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
                   __do_##name al;                                 \
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:190:1: note: expanded from here
   __do_insw
   ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:557:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
   #define __do_insw(p, b, n)      readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
                                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/kcmp.c:3:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:84:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
   DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
                   __do_##name al;                                 \
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:192:1: note: expanded from here
   __do_insl
   ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:558:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
   #define __do_insl(p, b, n)      readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
                                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/kcmp.c:3:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:84:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
   DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
                   __do_##name al;                                 \
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:194:1: note: expanded from here
   __do_outsb
   ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:559:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
   #define __do_outsb(p, b, n)     writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
                                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/kcmp.c:3:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:84:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
   DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
                   __do_##name al;                                 \
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:196:1: note: expanded from here
   __do_outsw
   ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:560:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
   #define __do_outsw(p, b, n)     writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
                                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/kcmp.c:3:
   In file included from include/linux/syscalls.h:84:
   In file included from include/trace/syscall.h:7:
   In file included from include/linux/trace_events.h:9:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
   DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
                   __do_##name al;                                 \
                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:198:1: note: expanded from here
   __do_outsl
   ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:561:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
   #define __do_outsl(p, b, n)     writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
                                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> kernel/kcmp.c:117:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           filp_tgt = get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(filp_epoll, slot.tfd, slot.toff);
                      ^
   kernel/kcmp.c:117:13: note: did you mean 'get_file_raw_ptr'?
   kernel/kcmp.c:62:1: note: 'get_file_raw_ptr' declared here
   get_file_raw_ptr(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int idx)
   ^
>> kernel/kcmp.c:117:11: warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct file *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
           filp_tgt = get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(filp_epoll, slot.tfd, slot.toff);
                    ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   13 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr +117 kernel/kcmp.c

d97b46a64674a2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2012-05-31   96  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12   97  #ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12   98  static int kcmp_epoll_target(struct task_struct *task1,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12   99  			     struct task_struct *task2,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  100  			     unsigned long idx1,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  101  			     struct kcmp_epoll_slot __user *uslot)
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  102  {
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  103  	struct file *filp, *filp_epoll, *filp_tgt;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  104  	struct kcmp_epoll_slot slot;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  105  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  106  	if (copy_from_user(&slot, uslot, sizeof(slot)))
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  107  		return -EFAULT;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  108  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  109  	filp = get_file_raw_ptr(task1, idx1);
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  110  	if (!filp)
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  111  		return -EBADF;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  112  
f43c283a89a7dc Eric W. Biederman 2020-11-20  113  	filp_epoll = fget_task(task2, slot.efd);
f43c283a89a7dc Eric W. Biederman 2020-11-20  114  	if (!filp_epoll)
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  115  		return -EBADF;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  116  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12 @117  	filp_tgt = get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(filp_epoll, slot.tfd, slot.toff);
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  118  	fput(filp_epoll);
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  119  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  120  	if (IS_ERR(filp_tgt))
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  121  		return PTR_ERR(filp_tgt);
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  122  
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  123  	return kcmp_ptr(filp, filp_tgt, KCMP_FILE);
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  124  }
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  125  #else
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  126  static int kcmp_epoll_target(struct task_struct *task1,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  127  			     struct task_struct *task2,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  128  			     unsigned long idx1,
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  129  			     struct kcmp_epoll_slot __user *uslot)
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  130  {
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  131  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  132  }
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  133  #endif
0791e3644e5ef2 Cyrill Gorcunov   2017-07-12  134  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26996 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210205163752.11932-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2021-02-05 19:25 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-02-05 19:46 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202102060325.uqZRgPog-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox