From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14998C433DB for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B60664FCE for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B60664FCE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C85756B0006; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C36966B006C; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:27:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B4BD96B006E; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:27:43 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0234.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.234]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6BB6B0006 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:27:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558C7181AEF10 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77785501206.20.ice87_1a09afe275e8 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5E9180C07A3 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: ice87_1a09afe275e8 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2796 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf35.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3720C64FC4; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:27:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612560461; bh=yhmeBeO2q9xijicZxHwk14pnWtru8GjD3VNfn3hof+A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jq1wiEBjxnS0B9nj2LF6TPnCa1zsoQ5lcN0dPGqybCOSr2aGcaOohATh0eDj4BAC3 Ea3s/959s5gHpbtCcFW/UXRJo1D8TsV4jcTkkhI8pSz/rg59ss2BxxzJ9gbuYfH0QQ cPJWcRhSVyBPtqf2k6qkGIXgAI0xlG+mvcbUxED98M6kn3hvyY9wm3Kgw40qg5Xo6V MavGyes/ngq5FHv78MfXemZ243HgY4++5jpxVIwNcqGAlCLPxAv8tt8X37APea9auh eD3F018u2Zad/1p6KpUe8I5vGXFkgSLDSI6xwye1w2oiYyU+vTIb0PBtzb6r+3dup9 +F9sUFoQijPbw== Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:27:24 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Andrew Morton Cc: Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Nick Desaulniers , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Wei Yang , Arnd Bergmann , Vlastimil Babka , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Brian Geffon , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix BUILD_BUG_ON() error in get_extent Message-ID: <20210205212724.GA16835@Ryzen-5-4500U.localdomain> References: <20201230154104.522605-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20210112191634.GA1587546@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> <20210203184840.GA1711681@localhost> <202102031202.F0AEC4A7@keescook> <20210205190005.GB461042@localhost> <20210205130223.37e6bf7fb8bfc773db9b5fda@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210205130223.37e6bf7fb8bfc773db9b5fda@linux-foundation.org> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:02:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:00:05 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor > > > > > > > > Ping? It is pretty late into the 5.11 cycle and this is still broken. > > > > > > I think we should just do the __always_inline. Who can take this? > > > > This should probably go through -mm, unless we get an ack then Nick and > > I could take it. > > I added it to -mm on Wednesday. Thank you! I did not see an email but it looks like my tag did not make it on to the patch so that would make sense. It would be great if this could get into 5.11 but if not, we can always backport it Cheers, Nathan