From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A5C433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FD964EEB for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 79FD964EEB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 021BD6B0072; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:02:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EED236B007D; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:02:38 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DDE5E6B0081; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:02:38 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0083.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.83]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71756B0072 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:02:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin30.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FB51EF3 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77784833196.30.look40_1a16f60275e6 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BE0180B3AB8 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: look40_1a16f60275e6 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2582 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F82864E37; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612544542; bh=mRLXcHycpqWz6RYXFguofgmcLIjLH8pb28gtXmfiZCw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k3+Grm3Ba3qTErfUpaE6Q8Mj3x1WEQphDRx2WaMnWgsPGoHn66f5fmN/2yqCKCsyZ a6ZXinFwLp4coumI+IkweP08nYIKGzcpqmUZA/mvhs4zdon4YYGVqWCvF+j6PuTGsL 9ONDjwilxLCBTJs1Y3FLFgMrgmsxOnP8ASrytGgeIyXan3XiS6S1YhOZnwMIeBCORN 4oDGC85tMQ9dpqU6hVyZBxJ2BF7v0B/D+uhF1DxcIEZ2IgR1RPLSw/CudTRRkz7p+n 0t5SB3l4MoLf+qoQRZg9+r4EcNpnXtjnAOAx1TeoiUbl2hBwFNrmJBD9ik0eC2eBlr ghaON+vxn2m9Q== Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:14 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Lecopzer Chen Cc: Andrew Morton , Andrey Konovalov , ardb@kernel.org, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, broonie@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , dan.j.williams@intel.com, Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , gustavoars@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Jian-Lin Chen , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux@roeck-us.net, robin.murphy@arm.com, rppt@kernel.org, tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, yj.chiang@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: kasan: abstract _text and _end to KERNEL_START/END Message-ID: <20210205170214.GD22665@willie-the-truck> References: <20210204124658.GB20468@willie-the-truck> <20210204145127.75856-1-lecopzer@gmail.com> <20210204145547.GD20815@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:06:10AM +0800, Lecopzer Chen wrote: > I think it would be better to leave this for you since I'm not > familiar with the relationship > between vmemmap() and NUMA_NO_NODE. > > So I would just keep this patch in next version, is this fine with you? Yes, ok. Will