From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2F7C433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CDD64F7C for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A9CDD64F7C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E81736B0005; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E0A2C6B0006; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:54:28 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D21066B006E; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:54:28 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0222.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.222]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B478F6B0005 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BE8181AEF1A for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77781788616.01.balls94_1700e71275df Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D3310047BE2 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:28 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: balls94_1700e71275df X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2180 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F9A164E42; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:54:23 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Timur Tabi , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, roman.fietze@magna.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de, akinobu.mita@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf: make-printk-non-secret printks all addresses as unhashed Message-ID: <20210204155423.2864bf4f@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20210204204835.GA7529@amd> References: <20210202201846.716915-1-timur@kernel.org> <20210204204835.GA7529@amd> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:48:35 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote: > > + pr_warn("** Kernel memory addresses are exposed, which may **\n"); > > + pr_warn("** compromise security on your system. **\n"); > > This is lies, right? And way too verbose. Not really. More of an exaggeration than a lie. And the verbosity is to make sure it's noticed by those that shouldn't have it set. This works well for keeping trace_printk() out of production kernels. Why do you care anyway, you are just debugging it, and it shouldn't trigger any bug reports on testing infrastructure. That's why I like the notice. It gets the job done of keeping people from using things they shouldn't be using, and doesn't cause testing failures that a WARN_ON would. -- Steve