From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EACC433DB for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A612312E for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 18A612312E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 55BB28D002C; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:40:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4E3F76B00D5; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:40:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3D2498D002C; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:40:26 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0127.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.127]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238AC6B00C2 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:40:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EE5181AF5C2 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77722634010.16.pipe68_5e0273d27552 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05F6100E6912 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:25 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: pipe68_5e0273d27552 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1818 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83A4B185; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:40:21 +0100 From: Oscar Salvador To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform Message-ID: <20210119134016.GA23408@linux> References: <1610975582-12646-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:33:03PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Minor thing, we should make up our mind if we want to call stuff > internally "memhp_" or "mhp". I prefer the latter, because it is shorter. I would rather use the latter as well. I used that in [1]. MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE should be renamed if we agree on that. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/cover/20201217130758.11565-1-osalvador@suse.de/ -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3